A History of Matrimonial Institutions, Vol. 2 of 3Howard, George Elliott
History
A History of Matrimonial Institutions, Vol. 2 of 3
Howard, George Elliott
Families; Marriage -- History
to put away his wife for certain specified crimes;[82] or, indeed,
without assigning any cause whatever, though in that case he might
suffer serious disadvantage with respect to property.[83]
[Footnote 79: GEFFCKEN, _op. cit._, 33, 34, 43, 44. With this
view JEAFFRESON, _Brides and Bridals_, II, 295, 296, agrees:
The Anglo-Saxon wife, he says, could be repudiated at will by
her "master." But many writers hold that divorce by mutual
consent is recognized in the ancient Teutonic law. Thus HEUSLER,
_Institutionen_, II, 291, 292, declares that there was absolute
liberty of separation by agreement, and that one-sided divorce
(by _Kündigung_) was very restricted. A similar opinion is
held by ZOEPFL, _Deutsche Rechtsg._, III, 37, 38; POLLOCK AND
MAITLAND, _Hist. of English Law_, II, 390; GLASSON, _Le mariage
civil et le divorce_, 185 ff., 195; FREISEN, _Geschichte
des can. Eherechts_, 779-81; LOENING, _Geschichte des deut.
Kirchenrechts_, II, 617; SCHROEDER, _Rechtsgeschichte_, I, 174.
In general, _cf._ BRUNNER, _Rechtsgeschichte_, 302 ff.; WEINHOLD,
_Deutsche Frauen_, II, 43 ff.; GRIMM, _Rechtsalt._, 454; WALTER,
_Deutsche Rechtsgeschichte_, I, 134-36; GLASSON, _Histoire du
droit et des inst. de l' Angleterre,_ I, 119, 120.]
[Footnote 80: For examples among Franks and Alamanni see MEYRICK,
in _Dict. Christ. Ant._, II, 1111.]
[Footnote 81: GEFFCKEN, _op. cit._, 34, 43, 44. "Das erste
Volksrecht, welches die freiwillige Scheidung ganz analog dem
römischen _divortium communi consensu_ gestattet, ist der
seiner Entstehung nach in die erste Hälfte des 7. Jahrhunderts
fallende _pactus Alamannorum_."--_Ibid._, 44. The first formulary
(_libellum_ or _libellus repudii_) for a divorce by mutual
consent in the folk-laws appears in the _formulae Andegavenses_,
a collection made in the last quarter of the same century:
_ibid._, 44; also BRUNNER, _Rechtsgeschichte_, 403, 404; FREISEN,
_op. cit._, 778, 779. The following formulary for such a divorce
is taken from Marculf (II, 30) by GLASSON, _op. cit._, 186,
though it may have been intended for the Roman population living
on Frankish territory: "Idcirco dum et inter illo et conjuge
sua ... discordia regnat ... placuit utriusque voluntas ut se a
consortio separare deberent.... Propterea has epistolas inter
se uno tenore conscriptas fieri et adfirmare decreverunt, ut
unusquisque ex ipsis, sive ad servitium Dei in monasterio aut ad
copulam matrimonii se sociare voluerit, licentiam habeat."]
[Footnote 82: _Lex Visig._, III, 6, c. 2 (adultery); _Lex
Burgund._, 34, 3 (_adultera_, _maleficia_, _sepulcrorum
violatrix_): FREISEN, _op. cit._, 779.]
[Footnote 83: _Pact. Alam._, III, 3; _Lex Bajuw._, VII, 14; _Lex
Burg._, tit. 34, c. 2; _Lex Vis._, III 6, c. 2; FREISEN, _op.
cit._, 779.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account