A sailor's life under four sovereigns, Volume 3 (of 3)Keppel, Henry, Sir
History
A sailor's life under four sovereigns, Volume 3 (of 3)
Keppel, Henry, Sir
Admirals -- Great Britain -- Biography; Great Britain. Royal Navy
The report to which we gave currency last week, relative to the
return of Sir Henry Keppel, has since been confirmed; and we
understand another flag officer has been nominated successor to
Sir Stephen Lushington on the Brazil Station. On the return of the
gallant Admiral, the scandal with which his name has been associated
will be fully investigated, and the danger of acting upon an _ex
parte_ statement will probably receive another proof. Had Sir Henry
Keppel tamely submitted to the sentence of removal from the Cape
Station he would have been pleading guilty to a charge of a serious
nature, and we give him full credit, therefore, for having declined
to accept the South American command under such circumstances. This
treatment of a British flag officer shows to what a miserable ebb
the Navy has fallen. Had a general officer been complained of by a
Colonial Government he would not have been summarily dismissed or
transferred to another command unheard or untried. But, alas! the
Navy has no _Head_, able or willing to maintain the independence
of its officers. Any paltry complaint against a naval officer,
when urged by a civilian, or coming from the Horse Guards or Home
Office, assumes a degree of importance which it takes a deal of
correspondence and explanations to lessen or set aside. The naval
officer is often condemned on the shallowest of pretexts, and has no
Court of Appeal. With respect to the alleged scene or scenes on board
the _Forte_, we have heard so many different versions that we decline
to offer any decided opinion; but we contend on behalf of the service
for that measure of justice which is never denied to the veriest
criminal--a fair and full trial before condemnation. It may turn out
that Sir George Grey acted with unbecoming and causeless impetuosity,
and that a British Admiral was moved from a valuable appointment at
the request of the Home Secretary, because an irascible civilian
Governor chose to pick a quarrel. We demand on the part of the Navy
fair play. We ask no more, and we are satisfied that if it is not
freely accorded by the Board of Admiralty, there are champions of
justice enough in the House of Commons to take up the cudgels.
[Sidenote: June 26.]
H.M. Minister, Mr. Christie, embarked on board _Emerald_. Sunset,
resigned command of South American station to Warren, and shifted flag
to _Emerald_, embarking with suite at same time. Was informed that
during the night between fifty and sixty of the _Forte’s_ crew deserted.
[Sidenote: June 27.]
10 P.M.--Weighed. Although at that late hour, the crew of _Forte_
voluntarily waited up to greet their old Admiral and Captain with a
succession of parting cheers. Blue lights were burned as we steamed
round and stood out of Rio Harbour. Thirty-seven years since I first
entered it!
[Sidenote: July 2.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account