A year of prophesyingWells, H. G. (Herbert George)
History
A year of prophesying
Wells, H. G. (Herbert George)
Civilization, Modern -- 20th century; Europe -- History -- 20th century; Great Britain -- History -- 20th century
Under these circumstances anything may happen. Exaggerated estimates
of the effect of the tariff upon food prices will be used to scare
the struggling voter, and particularly the women, against Protection,
and--as the Labour Party has no Press worth talking about--tremendous
lies will be told about the Capital Levy. It will be represented as
a raid upon the savings bank deposits of the servant girl and the
children’s money-boxes, although as a matter of fact it is not to
touch any fortune under five thousand pounds, and only begins to press
heavily upon twenty thousand and upward. The Labour leaders, being for
the most part respectable but inaudible men, will never get that over
to the public in time. And in the ensuing panic and scrimmage it is
quite possible that that extraordinary old omnibus, the Liberal Party,
with Mr. Asquith the elder statesman, Mr. Churchill the junker, Mr.
Lloyd George the rather world-stained democrat, Sir John Simon, Mr.
Asquith’s once prospective successor, and a miscellany of other people,
pledged really to no more than the negative policy of no Protection
and no Capital Levy, will make quite a respectable run and get quite a
large proportion of its four hundred odd passengers into Westminster.
And what they will do there Heaven knows. Possibly fight among
themselves, and have another dissolution.
Meanwhile, as the struggle for the wheel goes on, the British ship
of state will drift through the winter as it has drifted through the
autumn, and M. Poincaré will continue to do what he likes with Europe.
Now this is really too preposterous a way of running the affairs of
a great people. It is bound to end in some great disaster. These
spasmodic appeals to the country whenever a Prime Minister gets
frightened by the aspect of the skies or whenever a quarrelsome
group has to be reunited somehow, produce a terrible vacillation and
ineffectiveness in the national conduct. It is time Great Britain came
up to date with a triennial or quadrennial election of the Legislature,
after the American and French fashion, and then stayed _put_. And
it is time, too, that Great Britain went beyond, and gave a lead to
America and most of the world by abandoning the present method of
voting with a single vote in a limited constituency, which absolutely
destroys any real choice of representation by the common man. The only
civilised method of democracy is Proportional Representation; in large
constituencies returning many members there is no other method which
gives the individual voter a reasonable opportunity of expressing his
real preference. It is the right way, and all other ways are wrong
and bad. This present election in Great Britain is the _reductio ad
absurdum_ of the current system. In the seething mass of British
opinion there are:
Out-and-out Protectionists hostile to Russia and France.
Ditto friendly to Russia but hostile to France.
Ditto hostile to Russia but abject to France.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account