London (England) -- Social life and customs -- 19th century
Look, for instance, at the House of Commons: the Lords meet for debate a
little after five, p.m., and separate generally a little before six,
p.m., and it is perfectly astonishing what an immense amount of business
they get through; but the Commons meet at four, p.m., and sit till one or
two, a.m.; the consequence is, that very little business is done: that we
have a great deal too much talking; that really conscientious members,
who will not forsake their duties, but remain at their posts, are knocked
up, and have to cut Parliament for a time; and that what business is done
is often performed in the most slovenly and unsatisfactory manner. A few
minutes’ reflection will make this clear. A bill is introduced, or,
rather, leave is given to a member to bring it in. It is read a first
time. To the first reading of a bill generally little opposition is
made. The member who introduces it makes a long speech in its favour,
and little discussion takes place. The real fight is when it is read a
second time. There are many ways of throwing out a bill without the
discourtesy of a positive rejection. The first of these means consists
in giving a preference to other “orders;” the second is, moving “the
previous question.” Another is, moving “that the second reading take
place this day six months.” If the bill get over the second reading, it
then goes into committee, when objectionable clauses are struck out and
fresh ones added, till the original proposer of the bill can hardly
recognise his offspring. The bill is then read a third time, and
afterwards sent up to the Lords. Possibly the Lords object to some parts
of it; a conference with the Commons is then desired, which accordingly
takes place, the deputation of the Commons standing with uncovered heads,
while the Lords, with hats on, retain their seats. The matter being
amicably arranged, and a disagreeable collision avoided, the bill is
passed through the Lords, where it usually creates a far more orderly and
less passionate debate than it has done in the Commons. The Lords being
assembled in their own House, the Sovereign, or the Commissioners,
seated, and the Commons at the bar, the titles of the several bills which
have passed both Houses are read, and the King or Queen’s answer is
declared by the clerk of the Parliaments in Norman-French. To a bill of
supply the assent is given in the following words:—“_Le roy_ (or, _la
reine_) _remercie ses loyal subjects_, _accepte leur bénévolence et ainsi
le veut_.” To a private bill it is thus declared:—“_Soit fait comme il
est desiré_.” And to public general bills it is given in these
terms:—“_Le roy_ (or, _la reine_) _le vent_.” Should the Sovereign
refuse his assent, it is in the gentle language of “_Le roy_ (or, _la
reine_) _s’aviser_.” As acts of grace and amnesty originate with the
Crown, the clerk, expressing the gratitude of the subject, addresses the
throne as follows:—“_Les prélats_, _seigneurs_, _et commons_, _en ce
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account