27 110 112 2 72 98 26 -24
15 97 97 0 78 98 20 -20
3 94 91 -3 82 96 14 -17
7 91 93 2 95 112 17 -15
20 106 116 10 118 140 22 -12
23 85 80 -5 81 88 7 -12
8 91 92 1 98 111 13 -12
12 98 86 -12 98 91 -7 -5
21 64 66 2 86 93 7 -5
4 96 111 15 83 102 19 -4
13 70 61 -9 66 60 -6 -3
18 98 101 3 90 92 2 1
16 65 74 9 74 81 7 2
10 110 116 6 104 107 3 3
28 81 83 2 95 94 -1 3
11 103 102 -1 101 95 -6 5
1 82 93 11 80 85 5 6
14 96 102 6 140 138 -2 8
19 96 97 1 98 90 -8 9
2 107 113 6 91 86 -5 11
9 83 102 19 87 91 4 15
Av. 91.5 94.6 3.0 91.2 97.5 6.2 -3.1
M 2 5 -3
75%ile 6 13.75 4.5
25%ile -.75 -4.25 -12
Q 3.37 9.00 8.25
P. E. (distribution) 2.09 8.24 8.86
P. E. (average) +-.45 +-1.79 +-1.84
Av.=-1.71 P. E.
M.=-1.63 P. E.
Lost in 2nd Gained in 2nd No Gained equally
period period change with gain in
1st period
Test group 9 11 1 9
Control group 10 11 8
The average gain of the test group was 3.09 points after 12 months,
compared with 2.25 after six. The control group, however, made an
average gain of 6.24 after 12 months, the gain after six months being
3.29. These numbers are insignificant as gains, but they at least show
no improvement in the test group which the control group does not reveal
as well. On the basis of the results, we may say that there has been no
improvement in I.Q. as a result of operation, either after six months or
after twelve.
There remains to be considered only the result of the Healy Picture
Completion Test. We have scores in this test for 18 pairs of cases. When
these scores are compared with those in the former tests, the results
stand as follows:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account