This use might be well subdivided into legitimate and illegitimate
offensive operations. There has been, unfortunately, ample example
of the use of both airships and aëroplanes for purposes that are
illegitimate and barbaric in the present war. To use the advantage
of travelling in the air at altitudes for the purpose of the wanton
destruction of harmless citizens, and, further, to destroy in cities
the amassed wealth of art that only centuries, not years, produce,
is an unrighteous use of the science of aërial navigation. Before
the war it was condemned by the Hague Convention. Since, it has met
with the denouncement of all civilised nations--save the one that has
perpetrated the outrages. In the case of the aëroplane raid made into
Germany by our own British naval airmen, one party of aviators went
to Cologne to try to attack the airship halls there. The city was
enveloped with an opaque fog, and it was hopeless to try to locate the
position of the airship sheds. Though the British aviators circled
over the town for an hour and a half they refrained from discharging
any bombs, rather than run the risk of destroying civilian life or
property. An example, indeed, of the legitimate offensive use of the
aëroplane was the attempt to destroy or put out of action the very
kind of aircraft which had been so wantonly used over Paris, Antwerp,
Ostend, and other cities.
Perhaps the most important offensive use of the aëroplane is for
fighting airship and aëroplane. Mention has already been made about the
deadly character of the aëroplane when it encounters an airship. When
it meets an aëroplane the chances are more evenly balanced. Success
will depend chiefly upon the speed of the respective aëroplanes, their
climbing power, their armouring, and the guns with which they are
armed. Speed and climbing power are perhaps the greatest protective
factors. Several stories have already been told of the pursuit of
German aëroplanes by those of the Allies. The climbing power of the
machines of the latter has often been the cause of victory. It is the
well-directed shot from above to which the airman is exposed that has
ended the career of airman and machine.
At the beginning of the present chapter it was pointed out that the
British and French aëroplanes generally fly at about 6,000 feet, which
is a height fairly safe from gun-fire. While speaking of the offensive
work of aëroplanes, a few more words about the attack on them by
gun-fire may not be out of place. As Mr. Lanchester has pointed out, an
aëroplane is liable to attack by rifle, machine-gun, and shell fire.
Ordinary field artillery fire can be put out of the question in the
use of so rapidly moving a target as an aëroplane in flight. He has
estimated that an aëroplane is absolutely safe from rifle or small-bore
machine-gun fire at 7,000 feet, and it would be difficult to hit it a
thousand feet lower.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account