An Examination of the Testimony of the Four Evangelists, by the Rules of Evidence Administered in Courts of Justice: With an Account of the Trial of Jesus — John Shaqi
An Examination of the Testimony of the Four Evangelists, by the Rules of Evidence Administered in Courts of Justice: With an Account of the Trial of JesusGreenleaf, Simon
Religion
An Examination of the Testimony of the Four Evangelists, by the Rules of Evidence Administered in Courts of Justice: With an Account of the Trial of Jesus
Greenleaf, Simon
Apologetics; Authority -- Religious aspects; Bible. Gospels -- Evidences, authority, etc.; Jesus Christ -- Trial
By competent evidence, is meant such as the nature of the thing to be
proved requires; and by satisfactory evidence, is meant that amount of
proof, which ordinarily satisfies an unprejudiced mind, beyond any
reasonable doubt. The circumstances which will amount to this degree of
proof can never be previously defined; the only legal test to which they
can be subjected is, their sufficiency to satisfy the mind and conscience
of a man of common prudence and discretion, and so to convince him, that
he would venture to act upon that conviction in matters of the highest
concern and importance to his own interest.(49) If, therefore, the subject
is a problem in mathematics, its truth is to be shown by the certainty of
demonstrative evidence. But if it is a question of fact in human affairs,
nothing more than moral evidence can be required, for this is the best
evidence which, from the nature of the case, is attainable. Now as the
facts, stated in Scripture History, are not of the former kind, but are
cognizable by the senses, they may be said to be proved when they are
established by that kind and degree of evidence which, as we have just
observed, would, in the affairs of human life, satisfy the mind and
conscience of a common man. When we have this degree of evidence, it is
unreasonable to require more. A juror would violate his oath, if he should
refuse to acquit or condemn a person charged with an offence, where this
measure of proof was adduced.
§ 28. Proceeding further, to inquire whether the facts related by the Four
Evangelists are proved by competent and satisfactory evidence, we are led,
first, to consider on which side lies the burden of establishing the
credibility of the witnesses. On this point the municipal law furnishes a
rule, which is of constant application in all trials by jury, and is
indeed the dictate of that charity which thinketh no evil.
_In the absence of circumstances which generate suspicion, every
witness is to be presumed credible, until the contrary is shown;
the burden of impeaching his credibility lying on the
objector._(_50_)
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account