phrase that can be applied to the lowest and highest with which you are
dealing, you may be fairly sure it is all-inclusive, and that,
therefore, “pleasure is moreness” is a true statement. Similarly, pain
is “lessness”.
If you understand these things your philosophy of life will become more
practical, and you will be able to help more effectively people who
fall into evil ways. Take drink. The real attraction of drinking lies
in the fact that, in the first stages of it, a more keen and vivid life
is felt. That stage is overstepped in the case of the man who gets
drunk, and then the attraction ceases. The attraction lies in the first
stages, and many people have experienced that, who would never dream of
becoming drunk. Watch people who are taking wine and see how much more
lively and talkative they become. There lies the attraction, the
danger.
The real attraction in most coarse forms of excess is that they give an
added sense of life, and you will never be able to redeem a man from
his excess unless you know why he does it. Understanding the
attractiveness of the first step, the increase of life, then you will
be able to put your finger on the point of temptation, and meet that in
your argument with him. So that this sort of mental analysis is not
only interesting, but practically useful to every helper of mankind.
The more you know, the greater is your power to help.
The next question that arises is: “Why does he not divide all feelings
into pleasurable and not-pleasurable, rather than into ‘painful and
not-painful’?” A Westerner will not be at a loss to answer that: “Oh,
the Hindu is naturally so very pessimistic, that he naturally ignores
pleasure and speaks of painful and not-painful. The universe is full of
pain.” But that would not be a true answer. In the first place the
Hindu is not pessimistic. He is the most optimistic of men. He has not
got one solitary school of philosophy that does not put in its
foreground that the object of all philosophy is to put an end to pain.
But he is profoundly reasonable. He knows that we need not go about
seeking happiness. It is already ours, for it is the essence of our own
nature. Do not the Upanishads say: “The Self is bliss”? Happiness
exists perennially within you. It is your normal state. You have not to
seek it. You will necessarily be happy if you get rid of the obstacles
called pain, which are in the modes of mind. Happiness is not a
secondary thing, but pain is, and these painful things are obstacles to
be got rid of. When they are stopped, you must be happy. Therefore
Patanjali says: “The vrittis are painful and non-painful.” Pain is an
excrescence. It is a transitory thing. The Self, who is bliss, being
the all-permeating life of the universe, pain has no permanent place in
it. Such is the Hindu position, the most optimistic in the world.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account