Arguments before the Committee on Patents of the House of Representatives, conjointly with the Senate Committee on Patents, on H.R. 19853, to amend and consolidate the acts respecting copyright: June 6, 7, 8, and 9, 1906. — John Shaqi
Arguments before the Committee on Patents of the House of Representatives, conjointly with the Senate Committee on Patents, on H.R. 19853, to amend and consolidate the acts respecting copyright: June 6, 7, 8, and 9, 1906.United States. Congress. House. Committee on Patents
History
Arguments before the Committee on Patents of the House of Representatives, conjointly with the Senate Committee on Patents, on H.R. 19853, to amend and consolidate the acts respecting copyright: June 6, 7, 8, and 9, 1906.
United States. Congress. House. Committee on Patents
Copyright -- United States
Mr. OLIN. That was a perfectly satisfactory provision, both to the
copyright owner and to the typesetter; but then the general public were
heard, and they said "no;" an English edition may be better than an
American edition, for one reason or another, and you must not deprive
us of the privilege of getting the best books. Libraries were heard,
and individuals were heard. And Congress then hit upon this expedient,
which was very simple and on the whole has been very effectual.
Congress said:
But this prohibition shall not apply in the cases mentioned in
certain specified sections referred to of the tariff act.
The sections of the tariff act referred to enumerated a certain number
of classes which Congress had thought were worthy of benefit from the
Government to the extent of allowing them to import books in limited
numbers free from duty. So there was ready-made for the hands of
Congress a certain list of people who import books who might be
allowed to benefit at the expense of the copyright proprietor, just as
they had been theretofore benefited at the expense of the customs.
That is the law as it stands to-day.
Then Congress added this further provision, that any individual also
shall be allowed to import not exceeding two copies in one invoice on
payment of the duty thereon, for use, and not for sale.
Like every other provision of a law after it has been duly tested by
use, it is fair to bring it before the legislature again and to call
attention to its results, and that is especially true where the
provision of law was necessarily adopted with haste and was obviously
a mere expedient for arriving at a wished-for result. And when this
conference convened the publishers said: "To some extent this section
has worked badly in certain ways," which I shall now point out. The
librarians in libraries and the colleges have generally availed
themselves of this privilege, being coupled with the privilege to
import without the payment of duty, and have imported copyrighted
books in those ways in large numbers. How far individuals have availed
themselves of their privilege it is impossible, or at all events would
be difficult, to tell; probably not to any great extent. The number of
men who care so much for an English edition of a book that they are
willing to write for it to a London bookseller and import it
themselves is not very large.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account