Astronomy Explained Upon Sir Isaac Newton's Principles: And made easy to those who have not studied mathematics — John Shaqi
Astronomy Explained Upon Sir Isaac Newton's Principles: And made easy to those who have not studied mathematicsFerguson, James
Science
Astronomy Explained Upon Sir Isaac Newton's Principles: And made easy to those who have not studied mathematics
Ferguson, James
Astronomy -- Early works to 1800
116. We find that the Sun, and those Planets on which there are visible
spots, turn round their Axes: for the spots move regularly over their
Disks[24]. From hence we may reasonably conclude that the other Planets
on which we see no spots, and the Earth which is likewise a Planet, have
such rotations. But being incapable of leaving the Earth, and viewing it
at a distance; and it’s rotation being smooth and uniform, we can
neither see it move on it’s Axis as we do the Planets, nor feel
ourselves affected by it’s motion. Yet there is one effect of such a
motion which will enable us to judge with certainty whether the Earth
revolves on it’s Axis or not. All Globes which do not turn round their
Axes will be perfect spheres, on account of the equality of the weight
of bodies on their surfaces; especially of the fluid parts. But all
Globes which turn on their Axes will be oblate spheroids; that is, their
surfaces will be higher, or farther from the centre, in the equatoreal
than in the polar Regions: for, as the equatoreal parts move quickest,
they will recede farther from the Axis of motion, and enlarge the
equatoreal diameter. That our Earth is really of this figure is
demonstrable from the unequal vibrations of a pendulum, and the unequal
lengths of degrees in different latitudes. Since then, the Earth is
higher at the Equator than at the Poles, the sea, which naturally runs
downward, or towards the places which are nearest the centre, would run
towards the polar Regions, and leave the equatoreal parts dry, if the
centrifugal force of these parts did not raise and carry the waters
thither. The Earth’s equatoreal diameter is 35 miles longer than its
Axis.
[Sidenote: All bodies heavier at the Poles than they would be at the
Equator.]
117. Bodies near the Poles are heavier than those towards the Equator,
because they are nearer the Earth’s centre, where the whole force of the
Earth’s attraction is accumulated. They are also heavier because their
centrifugal force is less on account of their diurnal motion being
slower. For both these reasons, bodies carried from the Poles toward the
Equator, gradually lose of their weight. Experiments prove that a
pendulum, which vibrates seconds near the Poles vibrates slower near the
Equator, which shews that it is lighter or less attracted there. To make
it oscillate in the same time, ’tis found necessary to diminish it’s
length. By comparing the different lengths of pendulums swinging seconds
at the Equator and at _London_, it is found that a pendulum must be
2-169/1000 lines shorter at the Equator than at the Poles. A line is a
twelfth part of an inch.
[Sidenote: How they might lose all their weight.]
118. If the Earth turned round it’s Axis in 84 minutes 43 seconds, the
centrifugal force would be equal to the power of gravity at the Equator;
and all bodies there would entirely lose their weight. If the Earth
revolved quicker they would all fly off, and leave it.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account