Aubrey Beardsley : $b the clown, the harlequin, the pierrot of his age — John Shaqi
Aubrey Beardsley : $b the clown, the harlequin, the pierrot of his ageMacfall, Haldane
General
Aubrey Beardsley : $b the clown, the harlequin, the pierrot of his age
Macfall, Haldane
Beardsley, Aubrey, 1872-1898; Illustration of books -- Great Britain -- 19th century
From mid-1892 to mid-1893, Beardsley then had advanced in craftsmanship
by leaps and bounds, nevertheless he was unknown at twenty-one except
to a small artistic circle. The _Bon Mots_ grotesques, mostly done in
the last half of 1892, began to appear, the first volume, _Sydney Smith
and Sheridan_, in the April of 1893; the second volume at the year’s
end, _Lamb and Douglas Jerrold_, in December 1893; and the third, the
last volume, _Foote and Hooke_, in the February of 1894. The _Morte
d’Arthur_ began to be published in parts in June 1893. The feverish
creation of the mediæval designs in the late part of 1892 alongside of
the _Bon Mots_ grotesques had exhausted Beardsley’s enthusiasm, and his
style evaporated with the growth of his weariness--by mid-1893 he was
finding the _Morte d’Arthur_ “very long-winded.” And what chilled him
most, he found the public indifferent to both--yet Beardsley knew full
well that his whole interest lay in publicity.
It has been complained against Beardsley that he broke his bond. This
is a larger question and a serious question--but it _is_ a question.
It depends wholly on whether he could fulfil his bond artistically, as
well as on whether that bond were a just bargain. We will come to that.
But it must be stressed that just as Beardsley had rapidly developed
his craftsmanship and style during his work upon the mediævalism of the
_Morte d’Arthur_, by that time he came near to the end of the book
he had advanced quite beyond the style he had created for it; so also
his next development was as rapid, and by the time he is at the end of
his new Japanese phase in _Salome_ we shall see him again advancing so
rapidly to a newer development of his style that he grew weary of the
_Salome_ before he completed it, and threw in a couple of illustrations
as makeweight which are utterly alien to the work and disfigure it. And
yet these two drawings were made immediately after working upon this
_Salome_, and were thrown in only out of a certain sense of resentment
owing to the suppression of two designs not deemed to be circumspect
enough. But Beardsley did not refuse to make new drawings in key
with the rest--he had simply advanced to a new style quite alien to
_Salome_, and he found he could not go back. This will be clearer when
we come to the _Salome_.
So precisely with the _Morte d’Arthur_; even the last decorations he
made were more akin to his Greek Vase style in _The Yellow Book_.
* * * * *
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account