Authors and their public in ancient times : $b a sketch of literary conditions and of the relations with the public of literary producers, from the earliest times to the fall of the Roman EmpirePutnam, George Haven
History
Authors and their public in ancient times : $b a sketch of literary conditions and of the relations with the public of literary producers, from the earliest times to the fall of the Roman Empire
Putnam, George Haven
Authors and readers -- History; Authorship -- History; Books -- History -- To 400; Literature, Ancient -- Appreciation; Literature, Ancient -- Criticism, Textual; Literature, Ancient -- Manuscripts
Clement gives some examples of borrowings or appropriations on the part
of writers and orators, and his list is so considerable as to leave the
impression that the public opinion to which he refers was either not
very active in discovering the practice, or was not a little remiss
in characterizing and in condemning it. Isocrates copies an entire
oration from Gorgias; Æschines makes free use in his discourses of
those of Lysias and Andocides. Even Demosthenes, the chief of orators,
occasionally yielded to the temptation; and among other instances,
Clement cites extracts from orations against _Aphobos_ and _Pantænetos_
which are identical with passages in the _Discourses on Ciron_ by the
old instructor of Demosthenes, Isæus.
Rozoir tells us that an anonymous work of six volumes (rolls) was
published under the title _Passages in the Writings of Menander which
are Not the Work of Menander_, and that Philostrates of Alexandria
accused Sophocles of having pillaged Æschylus, Æschylus of having
permitted himself to draw too much inspiration from Phrynichus, and,
finally, Phrynichus of having taken his material from the writers
who preceded him. Such charges become, of course, too sweeping to
be pertinent, and can probably in large part be dismissed with the
conclusion that each generation of writers ought to familiarize itself
with the work of its predecessors, and may often enough with propriety
undertake the reinterpretation for new generations of readers of themes
similar to those which have interested their fathers and grandfathers.
One evidence that the subject of plagiarism was a matter which in later
days engaged public attention is given by the Fable of Æsop on the Jay
masquerading in the plumes of the Peacock.
Clement points out that in connection with the fierce competition
between the poets of Athens for dramatic honors, no means were
neglected by the friends of each writer to bring discredit upon the
productions of his rivals, and that very many of the charges of
plagiarism can be traced to such an incentive. Aristophanes, who amused
himself by utilizing for his comedies the strifes between his literary
contemporaries, puts into the mouth of Euripides, whom he makes one of
the characters in _The Frogs_, the following biting words, addressed to
Æschylus:
“When I first read over the tragedy which you placed in my hands,
I found it difficult and bombastic; I at once made a severe
condensation, freeing the play from the weight of rubbish with
which you had overloaded it; I then enlivened it with bright
sayings, with pointed philosophic subtleties and with an abundance
of brilliant witticisms drawn from a crowd of other books; and
finally I added some pithy monologues, which are in the main the
work of Ctesiphon.”[33]
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account