A careful investigation of the deposits over a large area, however,
shows this view to be untenable; for while in most of the isolated
conical hills within the depression, the beds in question cap the
lower sandstones and clays (No. 7) of the Cenomanian, on a portion
of the edge of the western plateau they cap the bed of limestone
(basal member of No. 6) which itself caps the lower sandstones and
clays. (Plate I). There must therefore be an unconformable overlap
below the two series.
This is further borne out by the facts, first, that the ferruginous
silicified grit has never been observed to pass under the limestone
in the walls of the oasis, although found capping hills in close
proximity; and secondly, that the limestone never occurs below
the ferruginous silicified grit in the isolated conical hills. The
former would happen if the deposit in question represented the top
of the sandstones and clays, the latter if it represented the next
bed above the limestone.
Furthermore, these beds are found capping hills close to the
oasis-wall, and occurring on exactly the same level as the limestone
capping the latter, suggesting at first sight some sort of connection
between the two; the beds are, however, so entirely different that
it is not possible to imagine the one to be an altered condition
of the other; moreover, if such were so, the gradual passage of
limestone to the ferruginous beds should be visible, but such has
never been observed.
The only possible view of the origin of these beds, consistent
with the above facts, is that they represent a far younger deposit
than the strata on which they lie, a deposit formed in fact in a
slight depression in the Eocene and Cretaceous rocks, long anterior
to the time when erosion was carving out the area to its present
form. The pisolitic character of the iron-ore of Jebel Horabi and
the usually large amount of ferruginous material, as well as the
general character of the beds, indicate shallow-water lacustrine
deposition and precipitation. No organic remains have as yet been
observed in these deposits.
It should be mentioned here that it is frequently impossible to
draw any sharp of line of demarcation between these deposits and the
undoubted Cenomanian sandstones below, when they rest on the latter
in the hills within the depression. The sandstones themselves are
frequently ferruginous and limonitic in their upper layers. This,
however, is easily explained on the supposition that there would have
been considerable infiltration into these porous sandstones forming
the lake-floor, with consequent deposition of ferruginous material.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account