Birth control laws : $b shall we keep them, change them, or abolish themDennett, Mary Ware
History
Birth control laws : $b shall we keep them, change them, or abolish them
Dennett, Mary Ware
Birth control; Birth control -- Law and legislation -- United States
it practicable. And apparently he was not of a mind to leave his plan
behind him as a recommendation to his successor, Dr. Hubert Work,
former President of the American Medical Association. Judging by later
developments, it would have been futile for him to have done so.
When Dr. Work took office, he lost no time in making his gesture about
the enforcement of the obscenity laws; for only a few days after
he became Post Master General, the following official Bulletin was
conspicuously posted in all the Post Offices of the Country:
IT IS A CRIMINAL OFFENSE
TO SEND OR RECEIVE OBSCENE OR INDECENT MATTER BY MAIL OR EXPRESS
The forbidden matter includes anything printed or written, or any
indecent pictures, or any directions, drugs or articles for the
prevention of conception, etc.
The offense is punishable by a _Five Thousand Dollar Fine or Five
Years in the Penitentiary or Both_.
Ignorance of the law is no excuse.
For more detailed information on this subject read Sections 480 and
1078 of the Postal Laws and Regulations, which may be consulted at
any post office.
The Birth Control Herald of July, 1922, commented as follows on this
Bulletin:
If Dr. Work intends to enforce the laws, it does him credit. But
suppose he undertakes to prosecute all infringements? The relatively
low birth-rate in well-to-do families indicates wholesale breaking of
this law. How is he going to enforce it? Will he trail these several
million respectable, influential parents till it is discovered how
they learned the science of family limitation?
There are about twenty-five million families in the country and,
roughly speaking, ten million of these are the well-to-do—those
above the income tax exemption. Suppose a tenth of these can be
convicted of having secured by mail or express the contraceptive
information on which their own family limitation is based. The
authorities would hardly imprison a whole million. It would mean
“standing room only in the jails.” An alternative would be to fine
them. One million law breakers, fined $5000 each would provide Uncle
Sam with a handy five billion in these days, when the national debt
stands at about eight billion. But, like the jail idea, this might
be a bit impracticable! What alternative is there then? The million
malefactors might be _acquitted_,—but that would make the officers
of the law look silly. So,—there it is, a large problem staring at
the new Postmaster-General. How will he meet it?
Dr. Work’s Bulletin says “Ignorance of the law is no excuse.”
Similarly also, difficulty of enforcement is no excuse for him. So
long as the law stands he and the Department of Justice must carry it
out, or else be unfaithful and inefficient public servants.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account