Cassell's History of England, Vol. 6 (of 8): From the Death of Sir Robert Peel to the Illness of the Prince of WalesAnonymous
History
Cassell's History of England, Vol. 6 (of 8): From the Death of Sir Robert Peel to the Illness of the Prince of Wales
Anonymous
Great Britain -- History
The intelligence of the last violence offered to the Porte by Prince
Menschikoff reached England on the 30th of May. The British Cabinet took
a decisive resolution. On the 31st of May a despatch went forth from the
Foreign Office, placing the fleet under Admiral Dundas at the "disposal"
of Lord Stratford de Redcliffe, to be ordered whithersoever he would,
but not to be allowed to enter the Dardanelles, except on the express
demand of the Sultan. Two days afterwards, by a direct order, Admiral
Dundas was instructed to proceed at once from Malta to the neighbourhood
of the Dardanelles; and three days later, the French Government learning
this, and being desirous of acting in concert, the Emperor sent orders
to his squadron to quit Salamis, and proceed to Besika Bay. It was not
possible--it was not, at that stage of the question, desirable--to do
more. The two fleets were placed within call of the Sultan, and the
treaty of 1841 was not broken or strained.
The temper of the British Government now underwent a great change.
Its trust in the Emperor Nicholas was gone. On the same day that Lord
Clarendon entrusted the fleet to Lord Stratford de Redcliffe, he wrote a
despatch to Sir Hamilton Seymour, recapitulating, with trenchant brevity,
those "most solemn assurances" which the Czar had given over and over
again. It is a long catalogue; there are no less than sixteen distinct
pledges that the question of the Holy Places, and that alone, required
to be resolved. Yet at this very time the Czar was urging on Prince
Menschikoff to extort from the Porte a treaty which would have laid
that independence at his feet. The "explicit, precise, and satisfactory
assurances" which came day by day from St. Petersburg were day by day
proved to be worthless at Constantinople. The assurances of the Czar,
and the language and acts of his Minister at the Porte were in flagrant
contradiction. This flagrant "discrepancy," as the British Secretary of
State mildly called it, he did not fail to set forth as the ground of a
demand for explanations; nor did he fail to remark that Prince Menschikoff
had been supported by a display of force, with what object he desired the
Russian Government to explain. At the same time Lord Clarendon distinctly
informed the Russian Government that England was determined to abide
by that policy which held the preservation of Turkish independence and
integrity to be essential to the peace of Europe. Sir Hamilton Seymour
had already confronted Count Nesselrode with his promises. Nothing can
exceed the cool effrontery with which the wily old Chancellor maintained
that he had concealed nothing. His language, he averred, had always
pointed to the exact reparation which Prince Menschikoff had demanded, and
against which the Turkish Ministry and the British Ambassador had raised
such "unaccountable" objections. Well might Sir Hamilton remark that "a
long-cherished object" had been "sought by a tortuous path." Indeed, few
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account