Tang, it will be remembered, is a graduate of an American
university, and he is even more progressive than his patron, Yuan. In
making overtures to Yuan, Sunyacius and Wu of the rebels were showing
that they were strong and calm diplomats, who could waive a detail to
win a general cause. Recent Occidental politics exhibit no such example
of the suppression of factiousness. Wu, however, did not hesitate a
minute to tell the six powers that if they loaned money to the north,
or interfered, they would only prolong the war indefinitely.
On December 21, 1911, the line-up was as follows. Yuan, three of
the powers and some of the world’s financial syndicates, in favor
of a monarchy or war, with a loan to the north, arrayed against the
republicans. Wu, ever persistent in demanding a republic, or renewing
the war, with a trade boycott in the southern and central provinces,
against any foreign nation that loaned the north money. Some of the
American journals, surprisingly, opposed the republic. For instance,
on the very day that Doctor Sunyacius was named president, the New
York _Outlook_ (December 30, 1911), with snap judgment, stated that a
Chinese republic could, would and should not be set up at present, and
further that “Americans would do well to throw all their influence on
the side of a constitutional monarchy”. Nine-tenths of the _Outlook’s_
readers doubtless thought that if Homer could sometimes nod, such
surprising retrogressive words as these might be forgiven the generally
progressive _Outlook_. Similarly in England, the large London house
of Montagu, which has been prominent in very profitable railway loans
to China under the Manchu régime, issued a circular stating its
“satisfaction” when the republicans lost Hankau to General Feng, under
atrocious circumstances of unforgivable massacre and unnecessary arson.
_Memoria longa, lingua brevis!_ Some of Britain’s diplomatic force,
arguing like the reactionaries of George the Third’s day, said that
they favored a monarchy because India might want a greater share in
self-government than she had, forgetting that a wide-awake and fully
developed India meant greater trade for Britain. Three monarchical
nations said that they would favor destroying the American doctrine of
the “non-partition of China” and splitting the four dependencies and
the eight provinces north of the Yellow River from the rebel provinces.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account