Nor is this commission alone in attributing a great moral influence to economic conditions and in looking to the public for a large part of the remedy. In fact, it was simply following in the steps of the New York and Chicago Vice Commissions.[92] And all merely voiced a widespread conviction among social workers and the public generally. "Are flesh and blood so cheap," asks the Chicago Commission, "mental qualifications so common, and honesty of so little value, that the manager of one of our big department stores feels justified in paying a high school girl, who has served nearly one year as an inspector of sales, the beggarly wage of $4.00 per week? What is the natural result of such an industrial condition? Dishonesty and immorality, not from choice, but necessity--in order to _live_. We can forgive the human frailty that yields to temptation under such conditions--but we cannot forgive the soulless corporation, which arrests and prosecutes this girl--a first offender--when she takes some little articles for personal adornment.... Prostitution demands _youth_ for its perpetration. On the public rests the mighty responsibility of seeing to it that the demand is not supplied through the breaking down of the early education of the young girl or her exploitation in the business world" (Report, pp. 43-44). This insistence upon the _public_ as being really responsible for these economic and moral conditions is significant. For the Consumers are the public. Each individual of which the public is composed is, in one aspect, a Consumer, and it is important to notice how widespread is an insistence upon his responsibility in the matter. From this discussion it may be reasonably concluded: (1) that many persons in many industries are receiving less than a living wage, in the present acceptation of that term; (2) that many persons are being injured in health and limb by long hours, unsanitary workshops, and improperly guarded machinery; (3) that the conditions of work often tend to produce vice. The treatment has been largely statistical. No matter how thorough, therefore, it is subject to the limitations of this method. Sissy Jupe long ago called statistics "stutterings," and newer editions of Gradgrind have not perfected their articulation. Statistics are necessarily quantitative. They do well enough for computing rainfall, or something of the sort, but human life with its pleasures and pains, its joys and tragedies, refuses to be labeled and ticketed. It is intangible to such gross systems of classification. "All the world's coarse thumb And finger fail to plumb" the depths of happiness and suffering in the least of human creatures. FOOTNOTES: [85] U. S. Bur. Lab., "Women Wage-Earners in Stores and Factories," p. 119. [86] E. B. Butler, "Women and the Trades," pp. 320-1. [87] Preface to "Dialogue of St Catherine of Siena," p. 13: London, Kegan Paul, 1896.