Cyclopedia of Commerce, Accountancy, Business Administration, v. 02 (of 10)American School of Correspondence
General
Cyclopedia of Commerce, Accountancy, Business Administration, v. 02 (of 10)
American School of Correspondence
Accounting; Business; Commerce
2. Although the actual fines for failing to reach standard times were
insignificant, the men claimed that they were being robbed of thousands
of dollars in this manner. Neither fall─downs nor ability to lessen
standard time are always up to the man. It is therefore unfortunate
when a favorable chance occurs to lessen time, that the worker
deliberately holds back. It is also often unjust that he should be
fined for what may not be his fault.
Actual experience with these different wage systems brings out the fact
that psychology accounts for quite as much as any fair condition, and
that a good wage system must not only be fair but must also hit the men
right.
EMERSON EFFICIENCY SYSTEM
The most recent wage system is the Efficiency System, evolved
and perfected in theory by Mr. H. Emerson and his assistants and
practically applied by the officials in the shops of the Santa Fé
Railway.
[Illustration: Fig. 3. Diagram of the Gantt Premium Wage System]
This wage system superficially resembles the Halsey line, Fig. 4,
but in theory and in fact differs radically from all previous wage
systems, although it embodies much that was best in all of them. It
retains the principle of day pay irrespective of performance. It
retains in modified form the principle of a flat piece rate. Like the
Halsey system, it pays more per piece for less competent work. Above
all, it retains Mr. Taylor's and Mr. Gantt's principle of accurate and
scientific shop organization, including standard times for every job
and operation.
It pays a high premium above wage or piece rate for coöperation or
assistant foremanship on the part of the worker, and finally, as part
of regular and daily shop practice, it revises erroneous schedules
whether they be too low or too high, and it makes this revision
without lessening the earning power of the worker. In addition it
substitutes for the costly, annoying, inaccurate time recording of
each job, a general monthly efficiency record which covers the shop as
a whole, each department, gang, foreman, worker and job, and, based
on accurate study and efficiency, it predetermines, before work is
begun, the absolute cost of every operation.
These results are facilitated by recognizing that the attainment of
standard conditions as to all operations depends on four totally
different elements:
(1) The shop itself must be highly organized and efficiently operated.
This is a duty that devolves solely on the management, and for poor
organization and operation the worker is not responsible.
(2) The character of the work itself, the quality of materials, etc.,
may vary greatly on the same job at different times. Neither manager
nor worker is wholly responsible for this variation.
[Illustration: Fig. 4. Diagram of the Emerson Efficiency Wage System]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account