1234 1 2 3 4
·001234 ------- or ---- + ----- + ------ + -------
1000000 1000 10000 100000 1000000
II. 1003 1 3
·01003 is ------ or --- + ------
100000 100 100000
1003 1 3
·1003 is ----- or --- + -----
10000 10 10000
1003 3
10·03 is ---- or 10 + ---
100 100
1003 3
100·3 is ---- or 100 + ---
10 10
III. 1 2 8 3
·1283 = --- + --- + ---- + -----
10 100 1000 10000
= ·1 + ·02 + ·008 + ·0003
= ·1 + ·0283 = ·12 + ·0083
= ·128 + ·0003 = ·108 + ·0203
= ·1003 + ·028 = ·1203 + ·008
{ 1 is 1000 inches
{ 2 is 200
{ 3 is 30
{ 4 is 4
IV. In 1234·56789 { 5 is ⁵/₁₀ of an inch
inches the { 6 is ⁶/₁₀₀
{ 7 is ⁷/₁₀₀₀
{ 8 is ⁸/₁₀₀₀₀
{ 9 is ⁹/₁₀₀₀₀₀
136. The ciphers on the right hand of the decimal point serve the same
purpose as the ciphers in (10). They are not counted as any thing
themselves, but serve to shew the place in which the accompanying
numbers stand. They might be dispensed with by writing the numbers in
ruled columns, as in the first section. They are distinguished from
the numbers which accompany them by calling the latter _significant
figures_. Thus, ·0003747 is a decimal of seven places with four
significant figures, ·346 is a decimal of three places with three
significant figures, &c.
137. The value of a decimal is not altered by putting any number of
ciphers on its right. Take, for example, ·3 and ·300. The first (135)
is ³/₁₀, and the second ³⁰⁰/₁₀₀₀, which is made from the first by
multiplying both its numerator and denominator by 100, and (108) is the
same quantity.
138. To reduce two decimals to a common denominator, put as many
ciphers on the right of that which has the smaller number of places
as will make the number of places in both fractions the same. Take,
for example, ·54 and 4·3297. The first is ⁵⁴/₁₀₀, and the second
⁴³²⁹⁷/₁₀₀₀₀. Multiply the numerator and denominator of the first by 100
(108), which reduces it to ⁵⁴⁰⁰/₁₀₀₀₀, which has the same denominator
as ⁴³²⁹⁷/₁₀₀₀₀. But ⁵⁴⁰⁰/₁₀₀₀₀ is ·5400 (135). In whole numbers, the
decimal point should be placed at the end: thus, 129 should be written
129·. It is, however, usual to omit the point; but you must recollect
that 129 and 129·000 are of the same value, since the first is 129 and
the second ¹²⁹⁰⁰⁰/₁₀₀₀.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account