Elements of Morals: With Special Application of the Moral Law to the Duties of the Individual and of Society and the State — John Shaqi
Elements of Morals: With Special Application of the Moral Law to the Duties of the Individual and of Society and the StateJanet, Paul
Philosophy
Elements of Morals: With Special Application of the Moral Law to the Duties of the Individual and of Society and the State
Janet, Paul
Ethics
=Trust.=--Duties of the _depositary_ and the _deponent_.
=Of the possession in good faith.=--_The thing lost._
=Sales.=--Obligations of _seller_ and _buyer_.
=Of property in general.=--Violation of property or _theft_.--The
elements which constitute theft.--_Simple_ thefts and _qualified_
thefts.--_Abuse of confidence_, _swindling_.--Restitution.
=Promises and contracts.=--Differences between these two facts.--Strict
obligation to keep one's promises: rare exceptions (practical
impossibility, illicit promises, etc.)--Different _kinds_ of
contracts.--_Conditions_ of the contract: consent, capacity of
contracting parties, a real object, a licit cause.--Rules for the
formation of contracts.--Rules for the interpretation of contracts.
The immediate consequence of the right of self-preservation which each
has, etc., implies the _right of property_.
=31. Property.=--What is property? What is its origin and principle? What
objections has it raised? What moral and social reasons justify it,
rendering its maintenance both sacred and necessary?
"Property," says the civil code, "is the right to enjoy and dispose of
things in the most absolute manner, provided no use is made of them
prohibited by the laws or the rules." (Art. 544.)
"The right of property," says the Constitution of '93, "is that which
belongs to every citizen: to enjoy, and dispose at will of his property,
his income, of the fruit of his labor and industry." (Art. 8.)
These are the judicial and political definitions of property.
Philosophically, it may be said, that it is the right each man has to make
something _his own_, that is to say, to attribute to himself the
_exclusive_ right to enjoy something outside of himself.
We must distinguish between _possession_ and _property_. Possession is
nothing else than _actual custody_: I may have in my hands an object that
is not mine, which has either been loaned to me, or which I may have
found; this does not make me its proprietor. Property is the right I have
to exclude all others from the use of a thing, even if I should not be in
actual possession of it.
=32. Origin and fundamental principle of property.=--The first property is
that of my own body, but thus far it is nothing else than what may be
called corporeal liberty. How do we go beyond that? How do we extend this
primitive right over things which are outside of ourselves?
Let us first remark that this right of appropriating external things rests
on necessity and on the laws of organized beings. It is evident, in fact,
that life cannot be preserved otherwise than by a perpetual exchange
between the parts of the living body and the particles of the surrounding
bodies. Nutrition is _assimilation_, and, consequently, _appropriation_.
It is, then, necessary that certain things of the external world should
become _mine_, otherwise life is impossible.
Property is then _necessary_; let us now see by what means it becomes
legitimate.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account