Essays, or discourses, vol. 4 (of 4) : $b Selected from the works of Feyjoo, and translated from the SpanishFeijoo, Benito Jerónimo
Philosophy
Essays, or discourses, vol. 4 (of 4) : $b Selected from the works of Feyjoo, and translated from the Spanish
Feijoo, Benito Jerónimo
Spanish essays -- Translations into English
LVII. The second argument, is built on the correspondence of the four
humours of the body, with the four Aristotelic elements; that is to say,
the blood with the air, the choler with the fire, the melancholy with the
earth, and the pituitous with the water. But this puts us in a worse
situation than we were before. In the first place, it is a doubt among
the medical people, whether the humours of our bodies consist precisely
of four. Some say they are more, and others that they are less. Some add
to the four, the lymph, the pancreatic juice, and the nervous fluid;
and some again will not admit, that there is any other humour except
the blood. Secondly, if the four elements correspond only with the four
humours, we are left without an element to correspond with the solids,
which on account of the hardness of their substance, might with more
propriety be compared to the earth, than to the melancholy humour, which
is beyond comparison less hard and solid than the other. Thirdly, in the
same voluntary manner, with which they assign four elements to correspond
with the four humours, they may assign one element to correspond with the
flesh, another with the bones, another with the marrow, another with the
fat, or adipose substance, another with the tendons, and so on. Fourthly,
in order to reason justly upon the human body, or animal species, we
should not seek for four substances that are analogous to the four
humours, but for four that enter into all the mixtures; for the question,
relates to elements that partake of the composition of all mixtures in
general, and not precisely of the animal. But what traces can we discern,
of four humours, or four substances, equivalent to these, either in
minerals, or plants?
LVIII. The third argument in support of this quaternian system, is
pretended to be derived from experience; for it is alledged, that when
a piece of wood is burning, we see it resolve itself into the four
Aristotelic elements. At first it emits a small portion of water; then
it takes fire; the fire is followed by smoke, which we know to be of an
aerial nature, by its ascending to the airy region; and last of all,
there remains a portion of earth in the ashes.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account