Excursions in the County of Cornwall: Comprising a Concise Historical and Topographical Delineation of the Principal Towns and Villages, Together With Descriptions of the Residences of the Nobility and Gentry, Remains of Antiquity, and Every Other Interesting Object of CuriosityStockdale, Frederick Wilton Litchfield
History
Excursions in the County of Cornwall: Comprising a Concise Historical and Topographical Delineation of the Principal Towns and Villages, Together With Descriptions of the Residences of the Nobility and Gentry, Remains of Antiquity, and Every Other Interesting Object of Curiosity
Stockdale, Frederick Wilton Litchfield
Cornwall (England : County) -- Description and travel; Cornwall (England : County) -- History
Among its noble representatives are ranked the great Sir Francis Drake,
Sir Thomas Cottington, Secretary of State to Charles I., and Sir Richard
Weston, afterwards Earl of Portland and Lord Treasurer in the same
reign.[33] But the most interesting circumstance relative to Tintagell,
is its being the reputed birth-place of the renowned King Arthur;
respecting whom, it was the opinion of Lord Chancellor Bacon, that there
was truth enough in history to make him famous, besides that which was
fabulous. His history, however, has been so blended with the marvellous,
by the monkish historians, that some authors have been disposed to doubt
even his having ever existed; and certainly the circumstances connected
with his asserted birth at Tintagell, are not among those parts of his
story which are most entitled to credit.
The certainty, however, that there has been a _Castle_ at this place,
cannot be imaginary, even if we only judge from the ruins now existing;
but as far as regards its origin, there are many different accounts, and
none, perhaps, whose authority can be relied on. That there should have
been a castle erected here, in the time of the antients, is very
probable, as few places are so well calculated for the mode of warfare
then in practice. The commanding and open situation of this spot, with
other concurrent circumstances, leave but little doubt that this
fortress was erected long previous to the Conquest. “The ruins now
existing, consist of two divisions, one scattered over the face of the
main promontory, and another over the peninsula, which is severed from
it. The walls of the former are garetted and pierced with many little
square holes, for the discharge of arrows. They seem to have included
within them, two narrow courts. At the upper end of the most southern of
them, are the remains of several stone steps, leading probably to the
parapet of the walls. Here the ramparts were high and strong, this being
the quarter overlooked by the neighbouring hill. As they wound round to
the west, however, less labour had been expended upon their structure,
for a hideous precipice of 300 feet deep, to the edge of which they were
carried, prevented the fear of any assault in that quarter. The works on
the peninsula had been anciently connected with those on the mainland,
by a draw-bridge thrown across the chasm, in the division above
mentioned.”[34] This however had gone to decay in Leland’s time, and the
only means of approaching this part are by a dangerous and narrow
ascent, winding up the cliffs on the western side.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account