Free Opinions, Freely Expressed on Certain Phases of Modern Social Life and ConductCorelli, Marie
Religion
Free Opinions, Freely Expressed on Certain Phases of Modern Social Life and Conduct
Corelli, Marie
English essays -- 20th century; Great Britain -- Social life and customs -- 20th century
Quite recently a case was chronicled in the daily press of a clergyman
who went to visit a dying woman at her own request. She wished to make
a last confession to him, and so unburden her soul of its secret misery
before she passed away, trusting in God’s mercy for pardon and peace.
The clergyman went accordingly, and heard what she had to say. When the
unhappy creature was dead, however, he refused her poor body the sacred
rites of burial! Now it surely may be asked what authority had he or
any man calling himself a Christian minister to refuse the rites of
burial even to the worst of sinners? Whatever the woman’s faults might
have been, vengeance wreaked on a corpse is both futile and barbarous.
There is nothing in Christ’s pure and noble teaching that can endorse
so unholy a spirit of intolerance,--one too, which is calculated to
give the bitterest pain to the living friends and relations of the so
coarsely-insulted dead, and to breed in them a relentless hostility
to the Church and its representatives. For the poorest erring human
creature that ever turned over the pages of the New Testament, knows
that such conduct is not Christ-like, inasmuch as Christ had nothing
but the tenderest pity, pardon and peace for the worst sinner at the
last moment. When death steps in to close all accounts, it behoves man
to be more than merciful to his brother man. “For if ye forgive not men
their trespasses neither will your Father forgive you your trespasses.”
Still fresh in the minds of many must be the un-Christian conduct of
the late Cardinal Vaughan in denying the rites of Christian burial
to the venerable Dr. St. George Mivart. Dr. St. George Mivart was a
man of science whose theories did not agree with the tenets of the
Roman Catholic Church, and as he belonged ostensibly to that form of
faith, one may call him, if one so chooses, a bad Catholic. But when
it is remembered that within quite recent days, so-called “Christian”
priests in Servia have given their solemn benediction to the assassins
of the late King and Queen of that country, it is somewhat difficult
to understand or appreciate the kind of “religion” that blesses
murderers and regicides, yet refuses burial to a modern scientist who,
as far as his intellectual powers allowed him, was working for the
good and the wider instruction of the human race. At the time of the
“inhibition” and subsequent death of Dr. Mivart, I ventured to address
an “Open Letter” to Cardinal Vaughan on the subject. This Letter was
published in March 1900, and though no doubt the great “Prince of the
Church” never deigned to read it, a large majority of the public did,
and I have had much cause to rejoice that in the timorously silent
acquiescence of the Christian world in a deed which shames the very
name of Christ, I, at least, as one of the humblest among the followers
of the Christian faith, did have sufficient courage to speak out openly
against the wicked intolerance which made the Church itself seem mere
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account