French enterprise in Africa : $b the personal narrative of Lieut. Hourst of his exploration of the NigerHourst
History
French enterprise in Africa : $b the personal narrative of Lieut. Hourst of his exploration of the Niger
Hourst
French -- Sudan; Mali -- Description and travel; Niger River -- Description and travel; Tuaregs
As is well known, Timbuktu is not actually on the river, but at low
water is some eight or nine miles off. Djitafe is then the nearest
point of approach for canoes, but when the river rises they go up a
lateral arm, and come first to Koriomé and then to Day. At certain
times a stream, the bed of which is said to have been hollowed out,
or at least deepened by the hand of man, enables very small craft
to get up to Kabara, whilst more rarely, that is to say, when the
inundations are at their height, the various excavations behind the
Kabara dune are successively filled up, and boats can reach the
capital itself. As a general rule, however, merchandise is taken
into Timbuktu on the backs of camels and asses, the route varying
according to the state of the river.
The ancient capital of Nigritia, or the Sudan, as it was still
called not long ago in geographical text-books, has lost all its
mystery since it passed into the hands of the French, and opinions
are divided as to its present and future position. My friend Felix
Dubois has described it, and it would be alike a waste of time and
presumption on my part to attempt to supplement what he has said so
well. I shall content myself with noting the reason of the former
great commercial importance of Timbuktu; relatively considered of
course. “Timbuktu,” says an Arab author, “is the point of
meeting of the camel and the canoe.” That fact alone would not,
however, be enough to account for its prosperity; many other places on
the river fulfil this condition, as well if not better than Timbuktu,
for, as we can ourselves testify, the canoe and the camel only meet
there a few days in the year, and not always even as often as that.
In my opinion we have to seek the explanation elsewhere, and I think
I have found it. Here it is: camels cannot with impunity approach
rivers or other water-courses, for this reason. The banks are
subject to constant inundations, and, especially in the Niger basin,
quantities of succulent grass, containing a great deal of water,
everywhere spring up, which, though the camel eats them gluttonously,
are fatal to the “ship of the desert,” used as it is to dry food.
Now by a strange freak of nature, the part of the desert, I will not
say exactly the driest part, but certainly the portion containing
neither streams nor permanent pools, that vast expanse improperly
called the Sahara, stretches up to the very gates of Timbuktu, so
that caravans can reach the city without any risk to the animals. In
a word, may we not say that Timbuktu is not a port of the Niger in
the Sahara, but a port of the Sahara near the Niger?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account