Great captains : $b A course of six lectures showing the influence on the art of war of the campaigns of Alexander, Hannibal, Cæsar, Gustavus Adolphus, Frederick, and NapoleonDodge, Theodore Ayrault
History
Great captains : $b A course of six lectures showing the influence on the art of war of the campaigns of Alexander, Hannibal, Cæsar, Gustavus Adolphus, Frederick, and Napoleon
Dodge, Theodore Ayrault
Alexander, the Great, 356 B.C.-323 B.C. -- Military leadership; Caesar, Julius -- Military leadership; Frederick II, King of Prussia, 1712-1786; Gustav II Adolf, King of Sweden, 1594-1632; Hannibal, 247 B.C.-182 B.C.; Military biography; Napoleon I, Emperor of the French, 1769-1821 -- Military leade
Next year (B.C. 57) Cæsar conducted a campaign against the Belgæ, whose
joint tribes had raised a force of three hundred and fifty thousand
men. By prompt action and concessions he seduced one tribe from the
coalition, and by a well-timed diversion into the land of another,
weakened the aggressiveness of the latter. He had won a number of
Gallic allies. Curiously enough, all his cavalry throughout the war was
native, the Roman cavalry being neither numerous nor good. All told, he
had some seventy thousand men.
The Belgæ attacked him at the River Axona, but by dexterous management
Cæsar held his own, inflicted enormous losses on them, and finally,
from lack of rations, they dispersed, thus enabling Cæsar to handle
them in detail. Many gave in their submission; others were reduced by
force; disunited they were weak.
The Nervii, however, surprised Cæsar at the River Sabis, from ambush,
and came near to annihilating his army. He had forgotten Hannibal’s
lesson of Lake Trasymene. Nothing but stubborn courage and admirable
discipline--the knowledge, too, that defeat meant massacre--saved the
day. Cæsar headed his legionaries with superb personal gallantry, and
his narrow escape made him thereafter much more cautious on the march.
Out of sixty thousand Nervii, barely five hundred were left when the
battle ended. Their fighting had been heroic beyond words. Their defeat
and the capture of a number of cities induced many tribes to submit to
the inevitable.
The best praise of this splendid campaign is its own success. The
energy, rapidity, clear-sightedness, and skill with which Cæsar
divided, attacked in detail, and overcame the Belgian tribes with their
enormous numbers, is a model for study. But he still committed serious
errors, of which the careless march without proper scouting, which led
to the surprise by the Nervii, was a notable example. He was not yet
master of his art.
During the succeeding winter the Belgæ again banded together, and the
Veneti seized some Roman officers seeking corn (B.C. 56). This act
Cæsar considered in the light of a revolt, and determined summarily
to punish. The Veneti were a maritime people, living in what is now
Brittany, whose strongholds could only be reached by sea. Cæsar’s
attempts to attack them by land proved abortive, but his admiral, with
a fleet built for the occasion, worsted the Venetan squadron, and
Cæsar, with needless cruelty and distinct bad policy, put the Senate
to death and sold the tribe into slavery. Cæsar was personally humane.
These acts of extermination are the less pardonable. His lieutenants,
meanwhile, had subdued a part of Aquitania. All Gaul, save only the
tribes opposite the British coast, had, after a fashion, been reduced.
This third year in Gaul redounds to Cæsar’s credit for the general
scheme; to his lieutenants for the detailed campaigns.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account