Cities and towns -- Middle Atlantic States; Middle Atlantic States -- History
The founders entered into possession. The Indians bade them welcome, and
began to move their wigwams up the valley. It was their first step in the
many stages of their unreturning journey toward the setting sun. Their
own sun thus passed its zenith, but they did not know it.
The colonists fixed their home or village lots upon the land above the
sweep of the river floods, occupying for this purpose that part of the
city west of the present Ferry Street. They assigned to each proprietor
a village lot, two hundred feet square; a larger lot for a garden just
south of the village, and a farm upon the bottom-lands beyond, with
privileges in the outlying woodlands. Other settlers joined them. They
sold them village lots and farm and garden lands, until the farm lands of
the Van Curler grant were disposed of. Those who came still later bought
village lots, but they had to buy farms of the Indians from lands outside
of the Van Curler grant. Mechanics, traders and workmen came who did not
want land, or lacked the means to buy it. Many of the proprietors were
rich enough to own slaves, which—or shall I say whom?—they brought with
them. Very soon by dint of industry their houses were built of the lumber
sawed at their own mills, their farms were promising abundant crops,
their gardens were blossoming, while their cattle were grazing in more
distant pastures.
In this little republic the freeholders were the source of authority.
By them and of them five trustees were elected “for maintaining good
order and advancing their settlement.” The “Reformed Nether Dutch
Church” was early established with its elders and deacons, and later,
with its settled domine, maintained a guardianship over the people and
especially the widows, orphans, and the poor. The community was under
the titular jurisdiction of the province; the laws of Holland were in
force with respect to contracts, property rights, and domestic relations,
and were observed as a matter of course. The governor appointed the
trustees or their nominees, _schepens_ or justices of the peace, and they
appointed a _schout_ or constable, with large executive powers. This
official, conscious of his power, and arrayed in a garb denoting it,
solemnly pointed his pipe stem and sometimes even shook his sword, at
the wayward. If any were so refractory as not to mend their ways after
such an admonition, he haled them before the schepen. This magistrate,
as his commission was construed, had the right so to supply the defects
in the Dutch laws and the ordinances of “Their High Mightinesses, the
noble Dutch West India Company,” as to “make the punishment fit the
crime.” This meant that he could impose such a fine as the schout thought
collectible, or such other punishment as he would undertake to inflict.
Causes of great gravity, such as complaints by the traders at Beverwyck
that the accused had infringed upon their monopolies, were brought before
that jurisdiction, but the records disclose no practical benefits to the
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account