History of Chemistry, Volume 2 (of 2): From 1850 to 1910 — John Shaqi
History of Chemistry, Volume 2 (of 2): From 1850 to 1910Thorpe, T. E. (Thomas Edward)
History
History of Chemistry, Volume 2 (of 2): From 1850 to 1910
Thorpe, T. E. (Thomas Edward)
Chemistry -- History
That gases actually do move, and at rates depending on their specific
nature, was rendered probable—apart from this explanation of Boyle’s
law—by many phenomena observed by chemists and physicists in the
eighteenth and early part of the nineteenth century. It was known from
the observations of Leslie in 1804 that specifically light gases moved
or diffused faster than heavy gases. Attempts to determine these rates
were made by Schmidt in 1820, and by Graham in 1846, both of whom found
that the rate of movement of a gas was independent of its chemical
nature, and was determined solely by its mass: _gases move at rates
inversely proportional to the square roots of their densities_. The
following table given by Graham shows the experimentally ascertained
relative rates for a number of gases compared with the rates demanded
by the “_law of gaseous diffusion_.” Column one gives the name of the
gas; column two, the observed rate of diffusion; and column three, the
square root of the density of the gas (air = 1):
_Gas._ _Time of diffusion._ _√density._
Air 1 1
Hydrogen 0.276 0.263
Marsh gas 0.753 0.745
Ethylene 0.987 0.985
Nitrogen 0.986 0.986
Oxygen 1.053 1.051
Carbon dioxide 1.203 1.237
Nitrogen and ethylene are, chemically, totally dissimilar gases, but
they have the same density and hence the same rate of movement. As
Graham showed, it is possible to separate more or less completely a
mixture of gases, if the constituents are of different densities,
by taking advantage of their different rates of movement. Such an
_atmolytic_ method was employed by Rayleigh and Ramsay to prove that
atmospheric nitrogen contained argon.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account