History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 3Napier, William Francis Patrick
History
History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 3
Napier, William Francis Patrick
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
Meanwhile the French, in doubt of his intentions, appeared torpid.
Kellerman remained at Salamanca, watching the movements of the duke
Del Parque; and Gazan returned to Madrid. Milhaud, with a division of
the fourth corps, and some cavalry, was detached against Echavaria;
but, on his arrival at Cuença, finding that the latter had retreated,
by Toboado, to Hellin, in Murcia, combined his operations with
general Suchet, and, as I have before related, assisted to reduce
the towns of Albaracin and Teruel. Other movements there were none,
and, as the Spanish regiments of the guard fought freely against
their countrymen, and many of the prisoners, taken at Ocaña, offered
to join the invaders’ colours, the king conceived hopes of raising a
national army. French writers assert that the captives at Ocaña made
a marked distinction between Napoleon and Joseph. They were willing
to serve the French emperor, but not the intrusive king of Spain.
Spanish authors, indeed, assume that none entered the enemy’s ranks
save by coercion and to escape; and that many did so with that view,
and were successful, must be supposed, or the numbers said to have
reassembled in the Morena, and at Cuença, cannot be reconciled with
the loss sustained in the action.
The battles of Ocaña and Alba de Tormes terminated the series of
offensive operations, which the Austrian war, and the reappearance of
a British army in the Peninsula had enabled the allies to adopt, in
1809. Those operations had been unsuccessful; the enemy again took
the lead, and the fourth epoch of the war commenced.
OBSERVATIONS.
1º. Although certain that the British army would not co-operate
in this short campaign, the Junta openly asserted, that it would
join Albuquerque in the valley of the Tagus. The improbability of
Areizaga’s acting, without such assistance, gave currency to the
fiction, and an accredited fiction is, in war, often more useful than
the truth; in this, therefore, they are to be commended; but, when
deceiving their own general, they permitted Areizaga to act under
the impression that he would be so assisted, they committed not an
error but an enormous crime. Nor was the general much less criminal
for acting upon the mere assertion that other movements were combined
with his, when no communication, no concerting of the marches,
no understanding with the allied commander, as to their mutual
resources, and intentions, had taken place.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account