He is described: "Height slightly above average; other measurements considerably above average. From commencement, _growth and development regular and continuous. The whole frame perfectly developed for this period of life._" S----'s case is far more remarkable. He was evidently very small and undersized. "Height and all other measurements _greatly_ below average; the whole frame stunted and dwarfish. Advancement at first slight, and very irregular. Afterward rapid, and comparatively regular." He only gained in height three-quarters of an inch from thirteen to fourteen, where W---- had gained 3-5/8 inches, and H---- 3-1/8 inches. Yet, from fifteen to sixteen, where W---- only went ahead half an inch, and H---- five-eighths of an inch, S---- actually gained 4 inches, which must have been most gratifying. His weight changes were even more noticeable. From twelve to fifteen W---- gained 58 pounds, and H---- 39, while all S---- could show was 12. But from fifteen to sixteen see how he caught up! Where W----made 11 pounds, and H---- 10, S---- made 22. Where W----'s chest went up 1 inch, and H----'s 1-1/2 inches, S----'s went up 3 inches. Now, how long did these boys work? As Maclaren says "_Just one hour per week!_" What parent believes that any hour in that week was better spent--better for the comfort, for the welfare of the boy, or better in fitting him for future usefulness--or what nearly so well? Most boys waste that much time nearly every day. Look, too, at the benefit to the boy in all his after-life. Indeed, does not this hour a week, in some instances, insure an after-life, and snatch not a few from an early grave? Had every slim, thin-chested man in America, and every slim, thin-chested boy who never lived to be a man, spent an hour weekly under such tutoring, from the age of ten to eighteen, would not the benefit to our land in working-power, in vigor and force, and comfort as well, have been incalculable? And had it, instead of one hour a week, been two or three, or even an hour a day, might not the results have been even more gratifying? Professor Maclaren may well congratulate himself on such good results among the boys. But what has he done with men? Some years ago twelve non-commissioned officers, selected from all branches of the service, were sent to him to qualify as instructors for the British army. He says: "They ranged between nineteen and twenty-nine years of age, between five feet five inches and six feet in height, between nine stone two [128] pounds and twelve stone six [174] pounds in weight, and had seen from ten to twelve years' service." He carefully registered the measurements of each at the start, and at different times throughout their progress. He says: