Independence Day : $b its celebration, spirit and significance as related in prose and verse
History
Independence Day : $b its celebration, spirit and significance as related in prose and verse
Fourth of July -- Poetry; Fourth of July celebrations; Fourth of July orations
English statesmen, however, saw the danger of union among the colonies
long before the outbreak of the Revolution; and they shrewdly rejected
the plan of union of the Albany conference of 1754; and in the Revolution
itself a large part of England’s diplomatic and military efforts were
directed towards breaking up the easy communication among the colonies.
In modern times England’s colonies have been widely separated from one
another. There has been no large and rapidly increasing white population
on contiguous territory with ability for union. The dark-skinned
population of India is enormous in numbers, but incapable of the united
action of the Americans of 1776, and India is not considered a colony but
a territory continuously held by overwhelming military force. Instead of
a colonial population which threatened in a short time to outnumber her
own people, England’s power and population have, in modern times, grown
far beyond any power or population in her well-scattered white colonies.
The colonists at the time of the Revolution have often been described
as speaking of England as home and regarding the mother-country with no
little degree of affection; and while there is no doubt some truth in
this, especially as regards the people who were loyalists, yet a very
large proportion of the colonists had become totally differentiated from
the people of England. This was the inevitable result of having lived for
over a hundred years in the American environment. They were no longer
Englishmen. They had become completely Americanized. Certain classes
kept up their connection with England, and many of the rich planters of
the South sent their sons to England to be educated. But a very large
part of the colonists, especially in the older settled provinces, like
Massachusetts and Virginia, had forgotten England and were another people.
Instead of speaking, as novelists often describe them, in a formal
archaic way, using quaint phrases of old English life, the colonists
spoke with mannerisms and colloquial slang which were peculiarly
American. These peculiarities were ridiculed by Englishmen of the time
and formed part of Grant’s famous speech in Parliament, the burden
of which appears to have been that the colonists had become entirely
different from English people, and Grant is said to have given imitations
of what he considered their strange speech and manners. Mrs. Knight, in
her _Journal of Travel from Boston to New York_, had, many years before
the Revolution, given specimens of this difference; and the language of
the New Englanders which she describes was certainly not like anything in
England.
“Law for me—what in the world brings you here at this time of night? I
never see a woman on the Rode so Dreadful late in all the days of my
versall life. Who are you? Where are you going?”—Mrs. Knight’s _Journal_,
p. 23.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account