Japan and the Pacific, and a Japanese View of the Eastern Question — John Shaqi
Japan and the Pacific, and a Japanese View of the Eastern QuestionInagaki, Manjiro
History
Japan and the Pacific, and a Japanese View of the Eastern Question
Inagaki, Manjiro
Eastern question (Balkan); Europe -- History -- 1871-1918; Japan -- Politics and government
Admiral Stopford captured Beyrout, and Sir Charles Napier bombarded
Acre. The fall of the fortress of Acre—which was thought to be
impregnable—before the English fleet, terminated the war, and Mehemet
Ali became only an hereditary ruler over Egypt under the over-lord of
the Porte.
The breach between England and France having become serious, Russia
having obtained her desires stationed her fleet at Sebastopol, where it
remained quiescent during the English bombardment of Acre.
Thus, although Lord Palmerston succeeded in crushing the French
Minister’s scheme, yet he fell into the snare laid for him by Russia,
viz., of bringing about a diplomatic disagreement between England and
France.
But Russia did not gain by the transaction, for she in her turn lost her
single-handed power over Turkey, which was given into the hands of the
Five Powers.
Lord Palmerston offered the following condition to the Turkish
Government. “England having, in conjunction with other Christian Powers,
succeeded in restoring Syria to the Sultan, she is entitled to expect
that the Sultan, in return for such assistance, should secure his
Christian subjects from oppression.”[56]
At last the Syrian affairs were settled, but still England was always
dreading a French attack both on Egypt and Syria.
In 1844 the Emperor Nicholas paid his famous visit to England. What was
his object in coming to England at such a period? The only idea that I
can put forward is, that he wanted to see to what extent the
Anglo-French disagreement[57] with regard to Syrian affairs had reached;
also to widen them as much as possible in order to make it impossible to
form an Anglo-French alliance against him, and thus leave him a free
hand in the settlement of the Eastern Question when the fall of Turkey
should take place.
Nicholas was at once informed, after his arrival, by the British Prime
Minister, “that no foreign influence in Egypt would be allowed by the
British Government, who desired to keep the way open to India.” He at
once perceived that the English were fearful of the French historic
Napoleonic plans; and he at once used this fear to his advantage.
He first proposed a partition of Turkey, knowing that the English
Government would not dare to agree to it, because it would hurt the
national feeling of England. Soon after the Anti-Napoleonic Revolution
was over the Holy Alliance was concluded between several European
Courts, and the moral feelings in the western states of Europe were to
defend the weak against the strong, and to resist unjust aggression.
These feelings were clearly shown during the Russian oppression of
Poland (1837), and in the Independence of Greece (1821–1829).
In England these feelings had manifested themselves, and any English
Government which should venture to shock them would have been certainly
upset. Therefore, a proposed partition of Turkey by Russia was received
by the English Government with decided disfavour.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account