Life and marvelous adventures of Wild Bill, the Scout: being a true an exact history of all the sanguinary combats and hair-breadth escapes of the most famous scout and spy America ever produced.Buel, James W. (James William)
History
Life and marvelous adventures of Wild Bill, the Scout: being a true an exact history of all the sanguinary combats and hair-breadth escapes of the most famous scout and spy America ever produced.
Buel, James W. (James William)
Frontier and pioneer life -- West (U.S.); Hickok, Wild Bill, 1837-1876
Samuel Young testified that he was engaged in the saloon; that he had
just delivered $15 worth of pocket checks to the deceased, and was
returning to his place behind the bar when he heard the report of a
pistol shot; turning around, he saw the prisoner at the back of Wild
Bill with a pistol in his hand which he had just discharged; heard him
say, “Take that!”
Carl Mann was one of the proprietors of the saloon in which Wild
Bill was killed; was in the poker game; noticed a commotion; saw the
prisoner (whom he identified) shoot Wild Bill.
The defense called for the first witness, P. H. Smith, who said he
had been in the employ of McCall four months; that he was not a man
of quarrelsome disposition; that he had always considered him a man
of good character; that he (the witness) had been introduced to Wild
Bill in Cheyenne, and drank with him; that the deceased had a bad
reputation, and had been the terror of every place in which he had
resided.
H. H. Pickens said that he had known defendant four years, and believed
him to be a quiet and peaceable man. Wild Bill’s reputation as a
“shootist” was very hard; he was quick in using the pistol and never
missed his man, and had killed quite a number of persons in different
parts of the country.
Ira Ford had known the defendant about one year; “like a great many
others, he would go upon a spree like the rest of the boys.” Wild Bill
had the reputation of being a brave man, who could and would shoot
quicker than any man in the Western country, and who always “got away”
with his antagonist.
The defense called several others, the tenor of whose evidence was but
a repetition of the foregoing. No attempt was made to show that Wild
Bill had ever seen the prisoner.
The prisoner was called upon to make a statement. He came down from
the stage into the auditorium of the theatre, and with his right hand
in the bosom of his shirt, his head thrown back, in a harsh, loud and
repulsive voice, with a bull-dog sort of bravado, said: “Well, men,
I have but a few words to say. Wild Bill threatened to kill me if I
crossed his path. I am not sorry for what I have done. I would do the
same thing over again.” The prisoner then returned to his place on the
stage.
The prosecution then adduced testimony to prove that Wild Bill was a
much abused man; that he never imposed on any one, and that in every
instance where he had slain men he had done so either in the discharge
of his duty as an officer of the law or in self-defense.
The case having been placed in the hands of the jury, the theatre was
cleared, with the understanding that the verdict should be made known
in the saloon where the murder was committed. The prisoner was remanded
to the house where he had been imprisoned during the night. At 9
o’clock the following verdict was read to the prisoner:
DEADWOOD CITY, Aug. 3, 1876.--We, the jurors, find the prisoner,
Mr. John McCall, not guilty.
CHARLES WHITEHEAD,
Foreman.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account