London (England) -- Antiquities; London (England) -- History
These constant changes are very confusing, and the recital of them is
not very entertaining, but it is necessary to make the matter clear
for the proper understanding of the history of the time. The plan of
the old theatres, with their platform stage, was no longer of use for
the altered arrangements introduced at the Restoration. Successive
improvements in the form of the houses were made, but we learn from
Pepys that it was some time before the roofing of the building was
water-tight.
The public theatres were open in the afternoon, three o'clock being the
usual hour for performance, and the plays were therefore partly acted
in the summer by daylight. It was thus necessary to have skylights, but
these were so slight that heavy rain came and wetted those below. On
June 1st, 1664, Pepys wrote:--
"Before the play was done it fell such a storm of hail that we
in the middle of the pit were fain to rise, and all the house
in a disorder."
Davenant was the original planner of the modern stage and its scenery,
but Killigrew did his part in the improvement carried out. He was
somewhat jealous of his brother manager, and on one occasion he
explained to Pepys what he himself had done:--
"Feb. 12th, 1666-67. The stage is now by his pains a thousand
times better and more glorious than ever heretofore. Now, wax
candles, and many of them; then not above 3 lbs. of tallow:
now all things civil, no rudeness anywhere; then as in a bear
garden: then two or three fiddlers, now nine or ten of the
best: then nothing but rushes upon the ground, and everything
else mean; and now all otherwise; then the Queen seldom and
the King never would come; now, not the King only for State
but all civil people do think they may come as well as any."
Killigrew complained that "the audience at his house was not above half
as much as it used to be before the late fire," but in the following
year (February 6th, 1667-8) there were crowds at the other house. Pepys
relates:--
"Home to dinner, and my wife being gone before, I to the Duke
of York's playhouse; where a new play of Etheridge's called
'She Would if she Could,' and though I was there by two
o'clock, there were 1,000 people put back that could not have
room in the pit."
Pepys's criticisms on the plays he saw acted at these theatres were not
always satisfactory, and often they were contradictory. At the same
time he was apparently judicious in the disposal of praise and blame
on the actors he saw. Betterton was his ideal of the perfect actor,
and, so far as it is possible to judge as to one who lived so long ago,
public opinion formed by those capable of judging from contemporary
report seems to be in agreement with that of Pepys.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account