_Judges styled Reverend_ (Vol. viii., pp. 158. 276.).--With respect to the error into which I was led in making Anthony Fitzherbert _Chief_ Justice of the Common Pleas, I beg to express my thanks for our good friend's correction. My statement {352} was founded on the authority of the Visitation-Book of the county of Derby, A.D. 1634, in which Anthony Fitzherbert is "Chief Justice of ----;" and, as the question of his rank as a judge was not one at the moment of communicating my Note, I made no farther inquiry. I find, however, upon reference to Vincent's _Collections for Derbyshire_, that Anthony Fitzherbert is styled, in a very good pedigree of his family, "Unus Justiciariorum de Co[=i] Banco." Had I turned to Dugdale's _Origines Juridiciales_, the error might have been avoided. THOS. W. KING (York Herald). _Palace at Enfield_ (Vol. viii., p. 271.).--Queen Elizabeth, in the early part of her reign, frequently kept her court at Enfield. Her palace was the manor-house, near the church, of which little now remains. In Lysons' time (1793) it had been in a great measure rebuilt, and divided into tenements. He adds, "the part which contains the _old room_ is in the occupation of Mrs. Perry." When I saw this room, about twenty years ago, it was in its original state, with oak panels and a richly ornamented ceiling. The chimney-piece was supported by columns of the Ionic and Corinthian order, and decorated with the cognizances of the rose and portcullis, and the arms of France and England quartered, with the garter and the royal supporters. Underneath was this motto, "Sola salus servire Deo, sunt caetera fraudes." In the garden was a magnificent tree, a cedar of Libanus, which was pointed out to me as having been planted by Queen Elizabeth. But upon this point tradition was at fault. In the _Gentleman's Magazine_ for 1779, p. 138., may be seen an account of this remarkable cedar, which was planted by Dr. Robert Uvedale, the botanist, a tenant of the manor-house in 1670. The church at Enfield does not date farther back than the middle of the fifteenth century. The devices of a rose and ring, which occur over the arches of the nave, seen also upon the tower of Hadley Church, with the date 1444, "supposing it to have been, as is very probable," says Lysons, "a punning cognizance adopted by one of the priors of Walden, to which monastery both churches belonged, will fix the building of the present structure at Enfield to the early part of the fifteenth century." EDWARD F. RIMBAULT. _Sir John Vanbrugh_ (Vol. viii., pp. 65. 160. 232.).--Are not your correspondents on the wrong scent as regards the birthplace of Sir John Vanbrugh? In the memoir prefixed to the collection of his _Plays_, 2 vols. 12mo., 1759, it is said: