+-------------------+-----------------------+-------------------------+ | | Type of Implement | | | Levels +-----------+-----------+ Fauna | | | Ofnet |Sirgenstein| | +-------------------+-----------+-----------+-------------------------+ |A. Most superficial| -- | Bronze | | | | | | | | | Neolithic | -- | | | | | | | |B. 1. Intermediate | Azilian | -- | | | | | | | | Palaeolithic | | | | | | | 2. Deepest |Magdalenian|Magdalenian|} Myodes torquatus (the | | stratum at | | |} Banded Lemming) | | Ofnet | | |} | | | | |} | | 3. | -- | Solutréan |} Fauna of a northern | | | | |} character throughout: | | | | |} with Reindeer, | | 4. | -- |Aurignacian|} Mammoth, Rhinoceros | | | | |} tichorhinus and Horse | | | | |} | | 5. Deepest | -- |Mousterian |} Myodes obensis (a | | stratum at | | | Siberian Lemming) | | Sirgenstein | | | | +-------------------+-----------+-----------+-------------------------+ When attention is turned from the cave-finds to those in alluvial deposits, names more numerous but less familiar meet the view. As the animals have been shewn to differ, so the types of implements provide a marked contrast. Yet a transition is suggested by the claim made on behalf of Mousterian implements for the Taubach deposits, a claim which (it will be remembered) is absolutely rejected by some experts of high authority.