Clergy -- England -- Biography; Stoughton, John, 1807-1897
In connection with my early residence at Kensington I may mention a
circumstance which interested me. I observed several times, sitting near
my pulpit, an old gentleman. Upon inquiry, I found it was the Rev.
Michael Maurice, father to the Rev. F. D. Maurice, then at the height of
his influence as author and preacher. I never had the pleasure of
conversing with my venerable hearer, but I learned from different sources
much relative to his character and career. Though descended from a
thoroughly orthodox family, he was educated for the ministry under Dr.
Abraham Rees, Dr. Kippis and Dr. Savage—the first two being Arian
divines, and the last a moderate Calvinist. He became afternoon preacher
at Dr. Priestley’s Meeting House; and after officiating in other
Unitarian places of worship, retired from pulpit work altogether. But he
habitually associated with orthodox Nonconformists during the time he
lived at Southampton. He also joined the British and Foreign Bible
Society, and spoke for it on the platform. I wondered he should worship
in Hornton Street, but information subsequently obtained served to
explain the circumstance. He appears to have been a devout man with a
large measure of Evangelical feeling. I mention him as a type of no
inconsiderable class of sincerely religious people.
I knew but little of his distinguished son, only having met him a few
times at Dean Stanley’s, and at Baldwin Brown’s. I used sometimes, on a
Sunday afternoon, to hear Mr. Maurice preach at Lincoln’s Inn, and was
much struck with the earnestness with which he repeated the Lord’s
Prayer. The difficulty he felt in making himself understood is amusing.
Some of the principles, he said, which his friends attacked, were those
he strongly objected to himself, and those which they held as against
him, were just those on which he rested his own faith and hope. “I could
not make them the least understand what I meant,” he went on to say; “and
if I did they would only dislike me for it.” It was not obscurity of
style, as many thought, which made him unintelligible; but obscurity or
confusion of thought arising from complexity of perception. He saw so
much that it puzzled him how to express it. I respected him greatly as
an honest thinker, more anxious to commend himself to the Searcher of
hearts than to his fellow-men.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account