Reminiscences of Prince Talleyrand, Volume 1 (of 2) — John Shaqi
Reminiscences of Prince Talleyrand, Volume 1 (of 2)Colmache, M., active 19th century
History
Reminiscences of Prince Talleyrand, Volume 1 (of 2)
Colmache, M., active 19th century
Talleyrand-Périgord, Charles Maurice de, prince de Bénévent, 1754-1838
“About the middle of the month of June, M. d’Escoïquiz received
another letter from the Prince of Asturias; in it was announced
that, through the medium of Don Juan Emanuel de Villena, his first
equerry, he had received an important billet, signed by Don Pedro
Giraldo, tutor to the Infant Don Francisco, and that this billet
was written by an individual belonging to the French Legation.
It contained the announcement of a most important and secret
communication, which it was the wish of the French ambassador,
M. de Beauharnais, to make to the prince. M. d’Escoïquiz, whom
the latter had consulted with regard to the line of conduct which
he ought to adopt, was of opinion that the prince’s reply should
be peremptory—that ‘he meddled not with public affairs, nor held
interviews with public men.’ Meanwhile, he undertook to discover if
the message really came from the French ambassador, or was merely
a trap laid by Godoï to condemn the young prince. This tried and
valued friend, never at a loss, had soon invented a pretext to
call upon the ambassador, to whom he was unknown. He requested
permission to present to M. l’Ambassadeur the first volume of an
epic poem, to be entitled ‘The Conquest of Mexico.’
“The ambassador, without appearing surprised at the sudden literary
reputation usurped by M. d’Escoïquiz, answered with courtesy that
he would receive with pleasure the book and its author. After a
few observations relating to ‘the Conquest of Mexico,’ some few
remarks on the state of affairs bringing each of them nearer to the
object they both had in view, M. d’Escoïquiz frankly questioned the
ambassador on the subject of the billet which had been delivered to
the Prince of Asturias, and begged him, as a point of honour, to
tell him the truth concerning it.
“The ambassador feigned a certain embarrassment, denied being
the author of the billet, yet wished it to be understood that in
reality he was; said that a message from an ambassador to the
heir-apparent would scarcely have been admissible, but declared
he felt much esteem for his royal highness, and that he would
be greatly pleased by the permission to pay his court, _en
particulier_, to the young prince. By all this specious reasoning
M. d’Escoïquiz judged of the truth, and at once told him, without
further disguise, that the prince firmly believed that the message
came from him.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account