Great Britain -- Social conditions -- 20th century
But far different is it when the family is driven from the countryside
into the slum. There the new civilisation decrees that men and women
must no longer live natural lives. If they have children they must pay
the penalty, and the penalty is that landlords refuse to accept them as
tenants. Long, long ago a Child was born in a stable 'because there
was no room for them in the inn.' There was room for tax-gatherers and
soldiers and traders, but there was nobody found to make room for a
woman in the hour of her direst need. The Child was shut {86} out.
But that was in a rude age and the door was shut by untutored men. The
most startling of all the facts which leap to light as we consider the
social and moral condition of our generation is the fact that after
nineteen centuries of Christianity, in the heart of the most 'perfect'
development of civilisation, the same tragedy is perpetrated--the child
is shut out. There is room for everything but not for innocence.
There is conclusive evidence to prove that the property owner in London
has set his face against tenants who happen to be the unhappy parents
of little children.[2] Childhood is {87} that which nobody now desires
except a few poor people whom the Malthusians have not yet instructed.
'A printer told me the other day,' says Monsignor Brown, '...he had
five children; when he went to an agent the other day, the agent bowed
him out and would not listen to him, though he wanted five rooms and
was prepared to pay the rent.'[1] If a family exceeds four the
position becomes acute. 'If a family consist of four or five
children,' declared the Assistant Housing Manager of the London County
Council, 'they would have a difficulty in obtaining accommodation.[3]
All this is quite natural. The property owner wants his rent, and he
wants it without his property suffering undue dilapidation. And the
rent is more certain when there are not more than two or three
children. He is not a philanthropist; he wants his money, the race
must look after itself. Profits and not children--that is the rule of
{88} his life. In every city it is the same. The owner of house
property will not have children in his houses, even as the London
County Council will not have married women as teachers--for they might
have children! This then is what we have done. We have deprived
four-fifths of our population of their birthright in the air and the
sunshine and the land, and we have decreed that they must live
unnatural lives--otherwise we will allow them no place wherein to live!
We have built up a civilisation in the midst of which childhood is
anathema.
III
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account