The Bloody Theatre, or Martyrs Mirror of the Defenseless Christians: who baptized only upon confession of faith, and who suffered and died for the testimony of Jesus, their savior, from the time of Christ to the year A.D. 1660Braght, Thieleman J. van (Thieleman Janszoon)
History
The Bloody Theatre, or Martyrs Mirror of the Defenseless Christians: who baptized only upon confession of faith, and who suffered and died for the testimony of Jesus, their savior, from the time of Christ to the year A.D. 1660
Braght, Thieleman J. van (Thieleman Janszoon)
Anabaptists -- Europe -- Biography; Christian martyrs -- Biography; Persecution
[40] In the clefts of the rock and in the secret places of the
stairs, that is, in persecutions and in solitary and strange regions;
just as “among the thorns” signifies, in the power of evil-minded and
bloodthirsty tyrants.
But, lest any should misconstrue our preceding proposition, let it be
understood, that when we speak of the obscuration, concealment, or the
becoming invisible, of the church of God, we do not mean the church in
general, or in all places, for the church in general has never been
obscured and hidden in all places at the same time; but we mean thereby
some parts of the church in general, namely, some particular societies,
belonging to the body of the general church which is spread over the
whole earth.
It must be stated, also, that by the term, general church, we do not
understand all the churches which bear the Christian name; but only
those who express the Christian name by their upright faith and pure
observance of the Christian and Evangelical commandments.
Now the question arises, whether our church of the present day, called
the Anabaptists, has truly descended, and derived her succession, from
the aforementioned church of God which has existed from the beginning,
and kept the commandments of God in purity.
But, in order to do this briefly and in the best manner, we shall leave
untouched the time and condition of the church from Adam to Christ,
as being an undisputed point; and only examine the time and condition
of the church after the advent of Christ; for the point of difference
relates solely to those who and which, by virtue of true succession,
have a right to the same.
THE SUCCESSION OF THE CHURCH OF GOD, PERSONAL SUCCESSION, AND
SUCCESSION OF DOCTRINE.
From the Latin word _succedo_, that is, to go under, or to take the
place of one, is derived the word, _succession_, which we, though
improperly, have mixed into our Dutch language. The various branches
proceeding from this root, that is, the numerous words taking their
origin from it, together with their significations, we leave untouched;
in general we understand by it, to follow any one in his place, right,
or reign.
There is a twofold succession, natural and spiritual, political and
ecclesiastical, or civil and ecclesiastical; but we have to speak here
only of the spiritual and ecclesiastical, and not of the natural,
political, or civil, succession; for only the former, and, by no means,
the latter, belongs here.[41]
[41] There is not only a natural and spiritual succession, which
could be considered as indifferent only; but both, the natural and
the spiritual, can be good or bad, for in both we find either the
one or the other. But we purpose to speak here only of a spiritual
succession, and, moreover, of such an one that is good. This we shall
consider with regard to good persons as well as to good doctrine.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account