The Church, the Falling Away, and the Restoration — John Shaqi
The Church, the Falling Away, and the RestorationShepherd, J. W. (James Walton)
Religion
The Church, the Falling Away, and the Restoration
Shepherd, J. W. (James Walton)
Churches of Christ -- Doctrines; Disciples of Christ -- Controversial literature; Disciples of Christ -- Doctrines
The changes which the constitution of the Christian Church underwent
during this period related especially to the following particulars:
(1) The distinction of bishops from presbyters, and the gradual
development of the monarchico-episcopal church government; (2) The
distinction of the clergy from the laity, and the formation of a
sacerdotal caste, as opposed to the evangelical idea of the
priesthood; (3) The multiplication of church offices. (Church History,
Vol. I, page 259.)
Since it has been shown that episcopacy was the outgrowth of a wicked
ambition for leadership and power that culminated in the papacy, I deem
it important to give ample proof, since it is yet very popular in many
of the denominations of this day. I now invite attention to the
testimony of Mosheim. He says:
1. The form of church government which began to exist in the preceding
century was in this century more industriously established and
confirmed in all its parts. One president, or bishop, presided over
each church. He was created by the common suffrage of the whole
people. With presbyters for his council, whose number was not fixed,
it was his business to watch over the interest of the whole Church,
and to assign to each presbyter his station. Subject to the bishop and
also to the presbyters were the servants or deacons, who were divided
into certain classes, because all the duties which the interests of
the Church required could not well be attended to by them all.
2. During a great portion of this century [second] all the churches
continued to be, as at first, independent of each other, or were
connected by no consociations or confederations. Each church was a
kind of small, independent republic, governing itself by its own laws,
enacted or at least sanctioned by the people. But in the process of
time it became customary for all the Christian churches within the
same province to unite and form a sort of larger society or
commonwealth; and in the manner of confederated republics, to hold
their conventions at stated times, and there deliberate for the common
advantage of the whole confederation. This custom first arose among
the Greeks, with whom a political confederation of cities, and the
consequent convention of their several delegates, had been long known;
but afterward, the utility of the thing being seen, the custom
extended through all the countries where there were Christian
churches. Such conventions of delegates from several churches
assembled for deliberation were called by the Greeks synods and by the
Latins councils; and the laws agreed upon in them were called canons,
that is, rules.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account