The Crime of Caste in Our CountryDavenport, Benjamin Rush
History
The Crime of Caste in Our Country
Davenport, Benjamin Rush
Social problems; United States -- Social conditions -- 1865-1918
“But there is another element, and one which always has and
always will contribute to Democratic success. Naturalization was
unusually large this year; the citizen of foreign birth is a power
in the land and the Democratic party was felicitously named. There
is something in the word ‘Democracy’ which appeals strongly to
the citizen of foreign birth. In this country ‘Democracy,’ as
applied to the Democratic party, signifies to them that have left
their homes in Europe, a party of the people in contradistinction
to plutocracy and to aristocracy, the party of wealth and the
party of people of noble birth. That this has weight with a
certain foreign element is conclusively shown in the statement
made by several foreign laborers in Washington County. Their
knowledge of things American is not sufficient for them to grasp
the import of the policies advocated by either party, and hence
it is that they vote for the party whose name means the most to
them. From a talk with many of them I am convinced that it is a
natural antagonism toward the party in power, a love for the word
‘Democracy’ that caused not a few newly made citizens to vote for
Mr. Cleveland. One of them told me that the Republican party was
made up of bankers, of great manufacturers, of men who had formed
combinations for the purpose of advancing the cost of necessities
of life--the party, in fact, to which every one who has money
belongs. In other words, that to be a Republican is to be a
capitalist, and to be a Democrat is to be a man of the people:
that by voting the Democratic ticket the power could be taken from
the capitalist and put into the hands of the people, and that the
people ruling the people would mean legislation which would give
the greatest good to the greatest number.
“A talk with the people shows further that the Republican party
is still very much in existence; that its defeat in this election
does not mean a rebuke for anything that it has ever done, nor
for any policy which it advocates, but it means that unless
the Democratic party makes good the promise which it has given
to bring about better times, it will meet with a defeat more
overwhelming than that which overturned and shattered Republican
hopes in 1892, and that the Democrats will not only lose the
States which have gone from the Republican ranks this year, but
that West Virginia, South Carolina, Alabama, and Louisiana will
turn from their allegiance to Democracy, cast their vote either
for a third party, for fusion, or for the Republicans, and for
future years make what is now known as the Solid South nothing but
a mournful Democratic memory.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account