The decay and the restoration of civilization : $b The philosophy of civilization, part 1Schweitzer, Albert
Philosophy
The decay and the restoration of civilization : $b The philosophy of civilization, part 1
Schweitzer, Albert
Civilization -- History
We began, therefore, to persuade ourselves that it was, after all,
possible to get through without any theory of the universe. The
feeling that we needed to stir ourselves up to ask questions about the
world and life, and to come to a decision upon them, gradually died
away. In the unreflective condition to which we had surrendered
ourselves, we took, to meet the claims of our own life and the
nation’s life, the chance ideas provided by our feeling for reality.
During more than a generation and a half we had proof enough and to
spare that the theory which is the result of absence of theory is the
most worthless of all, involving not only ruin to the spiritual life,
but ruin universal. For where there is no general staff to think out
its plan of campaign for any generation its subordinate officers lead
it, as in actual warfare so in the sphere of ideas, from one
profitless adventure to another.
The reconstruction of our age, then, can begin [pg 086] only with a
reconstruction of a theory of the universe. There is hardly anything
more urgent in its claim on us than this which seems to be so far off
and abstract. Only when we have made ourselves at home again in the
solid thought-building of a theory which can support a civilization,
and when we take from it, all of us in co-operation, ideas which can
stimulate our life and work, only then can there again arise a society
which shall possess ideals with magnificent aims and be able to bring
these into effective agreement with reality. It is from new ideas that
we must build history anew.
For individuals as for the community, life without a theory of things
is a pathological disturbance of the higher capacity for
self-direction.
* * * * *
What conditions must a theory of the universe fulfil to enable it to
create a civilization?
First, and defined generally, it must be the product of thought.
Nothing but what is born of thought and addresses itself to thought
can be a spiritual power affecting the whole of mankind. Only what has
been well turned over in the thought of the many, and thus recognized
as truth, possesses a natural power of conviction which will work on
other minds and will continue to be effective. Only where there is a
constant appeal to the need [pg 087] of a reflective view of things
are all man’s spiritual capacities called into activity.
Our age has a kind of artistic prejudice against a reflective theory
of the universe. We are still children of the Romantic movement to a
greater extent than we realize. What that movement produced in
opposition to the _Aufklärung_ and to rationalism seems to us valid
for all ages against any theory that would found itself solely on
thought. In such a theory of the universe we can see beforehand the
world dominated by a barren intellectualism, convictions governed by
mere utility, and a shallow optimism, which together throw a wet
blanket over all human genius and enthusiasm.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account