The Ethnology of the British IslandsLatham, R. G. (Robert Gordon)
History
The Ethnology of the British Islands
Latham, R. G. (Robert Gordon)
Ethnology -- Great Britain
The distribution of the words in question has long been an instrument of
criticism in determining both the ethnological position of the Pict
nation, and its territorial extent; and the details are well given in
the following table of Mr. Kemble's:
"If we now take a good map of England and Wales and Scotland, we
shall find the following data:--
"In Wales:
"Aber-ayon, lat. 51° 37′ N., long. 3° 46′ W.
Aber-afon, lat. 51° 37′ N.
Abergavenny, lat. 51° 49′ N., long. 3° 0′ W.
Abergwilli, lat. 51° 51′ N., long. 4° 16′ W.
Aberystwith, lat. 52° 24′ N., long. 4° 6′ W.
Aberfraw, lat. 53° 12′ N., long. 4° 30′ W.
Abergee, lat. 53° 17′ N., long. 3° 17′ W.
"In Scotland:
"Aberlady, lat. 56° 1′ N., long. 2° 52′ W.
Aberdour, lat. 56° 4′ N., long. 3° 16′ W.
Aberfoil, lat. 56° 11′ N., long. 4° 24′ W.
Abernethy, lat. 56° 20′ N., long. 3° 20′ W.
Aberbrothic, lat. 56° 33′ N., long. 2° 35′ W.
Aberfeldy, lat. 56° 37′ N., long. 3° 55′ W.
Abergeldie, lat. 57° 5′ N., long. 3° 10′ W.
Aberchalder, lat. 57° 7′ N., long. 4° 44′ W.
Aberdeen, lat. 57° 8′ N., long. 2° 8′ W.
Aberchirdir, lat. 57° 35′ N., long. 2° 34′ W.
Aberdour, lat. 57° 40′ N., long. 2° 16′ W.
Inverkeithing, lat. 56° 2′ N., long. 3° 36′ W.
Inverary, lat. 56° 15′ N., long. 5° 5′ W.
Inverarity, lat. 56° 36′ N., long. 2° 54′ W.
Inverbervie, lat. 56° 52′ N., long. 2° 21′ W.
Invergeldie, lat. 57° 1′ N., long. 3° 12′ W.
Invernahavan, lat. 57° 2′ N., long. 4° 12′ W.
Invergelder, lat. 57° 4′ N., long. 3° 15′ W.
Invermorison, lat. 57° 14′ N., long. 4° 34′ W.
Inverness, lat. 57° 29′ N., long. 4° 11′ W.
Invernetty, lat. 57° 29′ N., long. 1° 51′ W.
Inveraslie, lat. 57° 59′ N., long. 4° 40′ W.
Inver, lat. 58° 10′ N., long. 5° 10′ W.
"The line of separation then between the Welsh or Pictish, and the
Scotch or Irish, Kelts, if measured by the occurrence of these
names, would run obliquely from S.W. to N.E., straight up Loch Fyne,
following nearly the boundary between Perthshire and Argyle,
trending to the N.E. along the present boundary between Perth and
Inverness, Aberdeen and Inverness, Banf and Elgin, till about the
mouth of the river Spey. The boundary between the Picts and English
may have been much less settled, but it probably ran from Dumbarton,
along the upper edge of Renfrewshire, Lanark and Linlithgow till
about Abercorn, that is along the line of the Clyde to the Frith of
Forth."[8]
It cannot be denied that, in the present state of our knowledge, the
inference from the preceding table is that, whether Pict or not, more
than two-thirds of Scotland exhibit signs of _British_ rather than
_Gaelic_ occupancy.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account