(1). _Hadis-i-Z'aif_, or a weak Tradition. The narrators of it have been
persons whose characters were not above reproach, whose memories were bad,
or who, worse still, were addicted to "bid'at," innovation, a habit now, as
then, a crime in the eyes of all true Muslims. All agree that a {72} "weak
Tradition" has little force; but few rival theologians agree as to which
are, and which are not, "weak Traditions."
(2). _Hadis-i-Mua'llaq_, or a Tradition in the Isnad of which there is some
break. If it begins with a Tabi' (one in the generation after that of the
Companions), it is called "_Mursal_" the one link in the chain, the
Companion, being wanting. If the first link in the chain of narrators
begins in a generation still later, it has another name, and so on.
(3). Traditions which have various names, according as the narrator
concealed the name of his Imam, or where different narrators disagree, or
where the narrator has mixed some of his own words with the Tradition, or
has been proved to be a liar, an evil liver, or mistaken; but into an
account of these it is not necessary to enter, for no Tradition of this
class would be considered as of itself sufficient ground on which to base
any important doctrine.[66]
It is the universally accepted rule, that no authentic Tradition can be
contrary to the Quran. The importance attached to Tradition has been shown
in the preceding chapter, an importance which has demanded the formation of
an elaborate system of exegesis. To an orthodox Muslim the Book and the
Sunnat, God's word direct and God's word through the mind of the Prophet,
are the foundation and sum of Islam, a fact not always taken into account
by modern panegyrists of the system.
{73}
* * * * *
CHAPTER III.
THE SECTS OF ISLAM.
It is a commonly received but nevertheless an erroneous opinion, that the
Muhammadan religion is one remarkable for the absence of dogma and the
unanimity of its professors. In this chapter I propose to show how the
great sects differ in some very important principles of the faith, and
their consequent divergence in practice. There is much that is common
ground to all, and of that some account was given in the first chapter on
the "Foundations of Islam."
It was there shown that all Muslim sects are not agreed as to the essential
foundations of the Faith. The Sunnis recognise four foundations, the
Wahhabis two; whilst the Shia'hs reject altogether the Traditions held
sacred by both Sunni and Wahhabi. The next chapter will contain a full
account of the doctrines held by the Sunnis, and so no account of this, the
orthodox sect, is given in this chapter.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account