The heart of the railroad problem: The history of railway discrimination in the United States, the chief efforts at control and the remedies proposed, with hints from other countries — John Shaqi
The heart of the railroad problem: The history of railway discrimination in the United States, the chief efforts at control and the remedies proposed, with hints from other countriesParsons, Frank
History
The heart of the railroad problem: The history of railway discrimination in the United States, the chief efforts at control and the remedies proposed, with hints from other countries
Parsons, Frank
Railroads -- Freight -- Rates -- United States; Railroads and state -- United States
Free storage is another method of favoritism, sometimes used
systematically and extensively, as described by the Commission. “A
shipper sends a carload of freight to a specific destination consigned
to his order by arrangement with the carrier. The freight is kept in the
car or freight house or some warehouse which the carrier controls, and
on orders of the shipper or his agent issued from time to time the
freight is delivered in small lots to designated persons. These persons
are the actual consignees, and the shipper is enabled by this means to
avoid paying the higher less-than-carload rate and to reap other
advantages through this privilege of storage. Such special facilities as
storage, handling, cartage, distribution, and reshipment of less
quantities, either without charge or at extremely low compensation for
the character of the service, amounted substantially to providing a
shipper with branch business houses.”[72]
Overbilling and underbilling have been found to be very convenient
substitutes for the rebate. A bill of lading may acknowledge the receipt
of 70 barrels of flour; 65 only are shipped, and the railway pays
damages for the loss of the 5 non-existent barrels. On the other hand
railroads have been known to suggest to millers that they ship flour on
the generous plan of shipping 200 barrels and billing 125.[73] Some
shippers have been allowed to ship only 4 boxes of peaches to the
hundred lbs., while others were permitted to ship 6 boxes to the hundred
lbs. “That is the billing. Sometimes peaches are billed 4 boxes to the
hundred lbs. to one point, and 6 boxes to the hundred lbs. to a point
350 miles farther on.”[74] At another time the cashier of an important
firm is made a nominal agent for the railway company, and under the name
of commission to him an enormous rebate is allowed for all the business
his employers send over the line. Or again, the railway company
purchases from a favored trader its supplies of the goods in which he
deals, at a fancy price.
The “expense bill system” has proved to be an instrument of preference
and fraud. On presentation of an “expense bill” showing payment for
shipments into Kansas City the railroads would allow reshipment of an
equal weight from Kansas City to Chicago at the balance of the through
rate from the point of origin to Chicago.[75] This gave grain from the
West an advantage over grain grown near Kansas City. When the rate from
Kansas City to Chicago was 20 cents on wheat and 17 cents on corn the
grain carried on the balance of the through rate under the expense bill
system was carried 8 to 10 cents less than grain grown in Missouri and
Iowa.[76]
Not satisfied with the discounts obtained on actual expense bills,
shippers altered bills and forged new ones to enlarge their traffic at
the cut rates. In this way “expense bills showing a high balance were
constantly substituted for those showing a low balance.”[77]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account