The history of England, from the earliest times to the Norman ConquestHodgkin, Thomas
History
The history of England, from the earliest times to the Norman Conquest
Hodgkin, Thomas
Great Britain -- History -- To 1066
On the question of the point of departure from Gaul, reference may
be made to T. R. Holmes’s _Conquest of Gaul_ (London, 1899) and to
F. Haverfield’s review of that book in _English Historical Review_,
xviii., 334–6.
CHAPTER III.
THE CENTURY OF SUSPENSE.
The second invasion of Britain by Cæsar took place, according to Roman
reckoning, in the year 700 from the foundation of the City. The next,
the successful invasion which was ordered by his collateral descendant
in the fourth generation, the Emperor Claudius, took place in the year
797 of the same reckoning. There was thus all but a century between the
two events; that century which more powerfully than any other, before
or after, has influenced the course of human history; yet which for
that very reason, because in our chronology the years change from B.C.
to A.D., the historical student sometimes finds it hard to recognise in
its true perspective.
As far as the work of the literary historian goes, Britain is almost a
blank page during the whole of this century. It may be said that to the
eyes of the Romans, her own mists closed round her when Cæsar left her
shores, B.C. 54, and did not rise till Aulus Plautius approached them,
A.D. 43. But the patient toil of the numismatist[5] has discovered the
names of some British kings and enabled us to say something as to their
mutual relations; a few brief notices of Roman historians have faintly
illumined the scene; and it is now just possible to discern the actual
lineaments of one who is not entirely a creature of romance--the royal
Cymbeline.
As has been already mentioned, a certain Commius, king of the
continental Atrebates, was sent on an unsuccessful mission to Britain
before Cæsar’s first invasion. In the mighty refluent wave of the
Gaulish revolt against Rome, Commius either was actually swept away
from his former fidelity or was suspected of being thus disloyal.
However this might be, a foul attempt at his assassination, planned by
Cæsar’s lieutenant, Labienus, converted him into an embittered enemy of
Rome. He took part in the great campaigns of Vercingetorix; when they
failed he sought succour from the other side of the Rhine; as captain
of a band of freebooters he preyed on the subjects of Rome. At length
(B.C. 51), seeing that further resistance was hopeless, he made his
submission to Mark Antony, his only stipulation being that he might
be allowed to go and dwell in some land where he would never again be
offended by the sight of a Roman. With these words he vanishes from the
pages of the historian of the Gallic war. As we find about the same
time, or a little later, a certain Commius coining money in Britain, it
is, at least, a tempting theory that the Roman-hating Gaulish refugee
came to our island and reigned here over his kindred Atrebates and
other tribes besides.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account