The History of Oswestry: Comprising the British, Saxon, Norman, and English eras; the topography of the borough; and its ecclesiastical and civic history; with notices of botany, geology, statistics, angling, and biography: to which are added sketches of the environs — John Shaqi
The History of Oswestry: Comprising the British, Saxon, Norman, and English eras; the topography of the borough; and its ecclesiastical and civic history; with notices of botany, geology, statistics, angling, and biography: to which are added sketches of the environsCathrall, William
History
The History of Oswestry: Comprising the British, Saxon, Norman, and English eras; the topography of the borough; and its ecclesiastical and civic history; with notices of botany, geology, statistics, angling, and biography: to which are added sketches of the environs
Cathrall, William
Natural history -- England -- Shropshire; Oswestry (England) -- History
still called _the Hateleys_: on the east side of the church is a
field denominated _the King’s croft_, in which, it may be presumed,
were ranged those which the king commanded in person. These
positions exactly agree with the objects which we have assigned above
to the respective leaders; and lend, it is hoped, some confirmation
to the conjectural part of the preceding narration.
“While the hostile armies, drawn up in battle array facing each
other, waited, with mute expectation, the sound of the trumpet, the
dreadful signal for combat, two venerable divines, Thomas Prestbury,
lord abbot of Salop, and the clerk of the privy seal, advanced out of
the royal army, and proceeded towards that of Percy. The king,
desirous to spare the blood of his subjects, offered him and his
adherents pardon and peace, and redress of all grievances of which
they could justly complain. Hotspur was touched by these unexpected
overtures, made under circumstances of such numerical inequality, and
requested his uncle of Worcester to repair to the royal presence in
company of these holy men, and state the grounds on which he had
taken up arms. The king, we may suppose, was in his turn somewhat
softened by the sight of the earl, who had been so recently engaged
in the domestic office of governor to the prince of Wales; and a
recollection of the obligations he had received from the Percy family
might mix itself with his other reflections. It is certain that to
the remonstrances of Worcester, delivered in a fierce and haughty
tone, he listened with respect, and replied with a condescension
which, in the opinion of the spectators, was somewhat unbefitting the
royal dignity. A contemporary writer has preserved, though with a
mistake of the person, the dialogue supposed to have passed between
them. The king ‘counselled him to put himself on his grace.’ To
which the other replied, ‘I trust not in your grace.’—‘I pray God,’
rejoined the king, ‘that thou mayest have to answer for the blood
here to be shed this day, and not I. March on standard-bearer!’ and
the battle was set.—It is certain that the stern temper of Worcester
rejected all attempts at conciliation: he was conscious how deeply he
had been engaged in fomenting the quarrel; and, on his return to his
friends, he misrepresented the demeanour of Henry in such a manner to
his nephew, that the latter, with whatever reluctance, was compelled
to relinquish all hopes of accommodation. At length, therefore, much
of the day having been consumed in these fruitless negociations, both
parties flew to arms, and the air was rent with the war-cries of
‘_St. George_’ on one side, and ‘_Esperance Percy_’ on the other. In
the meanwhile, Glendower had advanced as far as Shelton on the
opposite bank of Severn, where he awaited the issue of the contest,
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account