We have already seen that in the endeavour to _perfect_ a vegetable
or animal race, the physiological equilibrium has sometimes been
destroyed at the expense of the reproductive power. In such cases,
crossing with another race which is less modified, generally revives
the extinguished fertility. For example, the English pigs imported
into the middle of France by M. de Ginestous became sterile after
several generations. Upon crossing them with a leaner and less
perfect local race, their fertility returned.
All these facts, and their inevitable consequences, have been
admitted by every naturalist who has studied the question. Even
Darwin has recognised the truth of them in his valuable work upon
the _Variation of Animals and Plants_. At that time he confined
himself to the conclusion that the crosses between some races of
plants are less fertile than between others, a proposition which
no one would think of denying. He has gone further in the latest
editions of his work upon the Origin of Species. Without bringing
forward clear facts, the meaning of which would go further than the
wise conclusions he had previously admitted, he invokes our relative
ignorance of what takes place among wild _varieties_, and concludes
that we must admit that the crosses between varieties must always be
perfectly fertile. This is one of those appeals to the unknown, one
of those arguments where even our ignorance is invoked as a proof,
which we too often meet with in Darwin, who is often carried away by
his convictions. I shall have to return to this point, but I here
make the statement as an established fact, on the authority even of
Darwin, that all _known_ facts attest the _perfect fertility_ of
mongrels.
Finally, the formation of _crosses between races_, or the production
of _mongrels_, is spontaneous, and may be promoted by man without the
least difficulty; the results are as certain as those with the union
of individuals of the same race; in certain cases, indeed, fertility
is increased or revived under the influence of this crossing.
Crosses _between species, or hybrids,_ will exhibit facts of an
entirely contrary nature.
III. The formation of hybrids, as of mongrels, may be either natural
or artificial.
The former is so rare that eminent naturalists have doubted its
reality. There are, however, according to M. Decaisne, a score of
well proved examples among plants. What is this number compared with
the thousands of mongrels produced every day under our eyes. And yet
the material conditions of fertility are identically the same with
races as with species, and our botanical gardens, which group numbers
of species side by side, facilitate crossing still more.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account