The Invasion of India by Alexander the Great as described by Arrian, Q. Curtius, Diodoros, Plutarch and Justin: Being Translations of such portions of the Works of these and other Classical Authors as describe Alexander's Campaigns in Afghanistan, the Panjâb, Sindh, Gedrosia and KarmaniaMcCrindle, John Watson
History
The Invasion of India by Alexander the Great as described by Arrian, Q. Curtius, Diodoros, Plutarch and Justin: Being Translations of such portions of the Works of these and other Classical Authors as describe Alexander's Campaigns in Afghanistan, the Panjâb, Sindh, Gedrosia and Karmania
McCrindle, John Watson
Alexander, the Great, 356 B.C.-323 B.C.; India -- History -- To 324 B.C. -- Sources
“The main body, the phalanx—or quadruple phalanx, as it was
sometimes called, to mark that it was formed of four divisions,
each bearing the same name—presented a mass of 18,000 men,
which was distributed, at least by Alexander, into six brigades
of 3000 each, formidable in its aspect, and on ground suited
to its operations, irresistible in its attacks. The phalangite
soldier wore the usual defensive armour of the Greek heavy
infantry—helmet, breast-plate, and greaves: and almost the
whole front of his person was covered with the long shield
called the _aspis_. His weapons were a sword long enough to
enable a man in the second rank to reach an enemy who had come
to close quarters with the comrade who stood before him, and
the celebrated spear, known by the Macedonian name, _sarissa_,
four-and-twenty feet long. The sarissa, when couched, projected
eighteen feet in front of the soldier: and the space between
the ranks was such that those of the second rank were fifteen,
those of the third twelve, those of the fourth nine, those of
the fifth six, and those of the sixth three feet in advance of
the first line: so that the man at the head of the file was
guarded on each side by the points of six spears. The ordinary
depth of the phalanx was of sixteen ranks. The men who stood
too far behind to use their sarissas, and who therefore
kept them raised until they advanced to fill a vacant place,
still added to the pressure of the mass. As the efficacy of
the phalanx depended on its compactness, and this again on
the uniformity of its movements, the greatest care was taken
to select the best soldiers for the foremost and hindmost
ranks—the frames, as it were, of the engine. The bulk and core
of the phalanx consisted of Macedonians; but it was composed
in part of foreign troops. These were no doubt Greeks. But
the northern Illyrians, Paeonians, Agrianians, and Thracians,
who were skilled in the use of missiles, furnished bowmen,
dartsmen, and slingers: probably according to the proportion
which the master of tactics deemed the most eligible, about
half the number of the phalanx. To these was added another
class of infantry, peculiar in some respects to the Macedonian
army, though the invention belonged to Iphicrates. They were
called Hypaspists, because, like the phalangites, they carried
the long shield: but their spears were shorter, their swords
longer, their armour lighter. They were thus prepared for more
rapid movements, and did not so much depend on the nature of
the ground. They formed a corps of about 6000 men. The cavalry
was similarly distinguished into three classes by its arms,
accoutrements, and mode of warfare. Its main strength consisted
in 1500 Macedonian and as many Thessalian horse. But the rider
and his horse were cased in armour, and his weapons seem to
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account