The life and times of George Villiers, duke of Buckingham, Volume 2 (of 3): From original and authentic sources — John Shaqi
The life and times of George Villiers, duke of Buckingham, Volume 2 (of 3): From original and authentic sourcesThomson, A. T., Mrs.
History
The life and times of George Villiers, duke of Buckingham, Volume 2 (of 3): From original and authentic sources
Thomson, A. T., Mrs.
Buckingham, George Villiers, Duke of, 1592-1628
The House, desirous to finish the matter, allowed Middlesex to produce
forty witnesses, twelve of whom deposed directly against him; upon this,
Prince Charles sent him a message, ordering him not to appear in the
royal presence again until he had cleared himself. This command was the
more necessary, since, at this very moment, the mind of James had been
impressed by Inojosa with a suspicion that his son and the Duke were
plotting against him; an idea which the King, with weeping, imparted to
his son and the Duke. “The Lord Treasurer,” Sir Dudley Carleton writes,
“is suspected to be at the bottom of it.” Hitherto, James had still
appeared confident of the Lord Treasurer’s innocence,[142] and in a
speech to the Lords, whom he had summoned to Whitehall,[143] he advised
them as to their judgment. “Such a trial,” he observed, “had no
precedent before the last parliament, and then the guilty party, Lord
Bacon, had confessed, now the supposed delinquent denied the charge.”
James, indeed, long clung to the Lord Treasurer, and told the lords he
came to “sing a psalm of mercy and justice about him;” still the trial
went on, and the accused, in spite of alleged ill-health, was examined
both morning and afternoon; his illness was found, however, to be
feigned; and his answers were so audacious, and so manifestly perjured,
that, had it not been for the intercession of the Prince, he would have
been sent to the Tower. Among other speeches, Middlesex said he had been
baited by two mastiffs, Crew and the Attorney General; and he reasoned,
in his defence, “saucily” for five hours, but was found guilty, and
sentenced to pay 50,000_l._ fine, and to lose his office; never to sit
in Parliament again, nor to come within the verge of the Court. “He
would,” Mr. Chamberlain writes, “have been further degraded, but that he
had great, if not _gratis_, friends in the bedchamber. He may live to
crush his enemies, if his brother-in-law, Brett, should get into favour
and marry the Duchess of Richmond, who would do anything to be prime
courtier again.”[144]
Footnote 142:
State Papers, clxiv., No. 12.
Footnote 143:
May 5th, 1624.--State Papers.
Footnote 144:
State Papers, clxiv., No. 86.
Regarding this sentence, Lord Campbell remarks:--"The noble defendant
had done various things, as head of the Treasury, which would now be
considered very scandalous; but he had only imitated his predecessors,
and was imitated by his successors."--A melancholy commentary on the
state of public morality. It must have been galling to Lord Bacon, in
his retirement, to have known that he was coupled with a man so
dishonest, so specious, and so degraded as Middlesex.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account